Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25700808›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2015

A clinical model for predicting lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal cancer.

Fernando Macias-Garcia, Catuxa Celeiro-Muñoz, Lucia Lesquereux-Martinez, Francisco Gude-Sampedro, Laura Uribarri-Gonzalez, Ihab Abdulkader, Ana Alvarez-Castro, J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tumor Location as a Prognostic Factor in T1 Colorectal Cancer.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando Macias-GarciaGastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, c/Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, fmacgar@yahoo.es.
Catuxa Celeiro-Muñoz
Lucia Lesquereux-Martinez
Francisco Gude-Sampedro
Laura Uribarri-Gonzalez
Ihab Abdulkader
Ana Alvarez-Castro
J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUnidad Funcional de Investigación de Enfermedades Crónicas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo single histopathological feature of submucosal invasive colorectal cancer (T1-CRC) can reliably predict the risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM).

aimThe purpose of the study was to develop a prediction model of LNM in T1-CRC.

methodsNinety-seven surgically resected T1-CRC at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. Morphology, localization, grading, mode of growth, presence of background adenoma, lymphoid infiltration, angiolymphatic invasion, budding, and depth of invasion were assessed. Mortality and morbidity related to surgery were also evaluated. Benefit-risk balance was assessed according to the presence of severe complications and to the presence of LNM.

resultsFourteen cases had LNM (14%). Eight patients (8%) presented severe surgical complications and there were two deaths (2 %). Infiltrative growth pattern (OR 31.91, 95% CI 2.37-428.36; p = 0.009) and the absence of lymphoid infiltrate (OR 28.75; 95% CI 2.13-388.37; p = 0.011) were the only variables independently associated with LNM in the multivariate analysis. Both variables were included in the prediction model together with sessile morphology (OR 4.88; 95% CI 0.81-29.3; p = 0.083) and poorly differentiated carcinoma (OR 11.77; 95% CI 0.77-179.83; p = 0.076). A 0-100 score was developed (infiltrative growth pattern: no = 0, yes = 33; lymphoid infiltrate: no = 29, yes = 0; sessile morphology: no = 0, yes = 15; poorly differentiated: no = 0, yes = 23). Cutoff point to indicate additional surgery was set in 35 points (i.e., 10% risk LNM). Discrimination of the prediction model was excellent (AUC 0.90; 95% CI 0.81-0.99).

conclusionCombined evaluation of infiltrative growth pattern, lymphoid infiltration, poorly differentiated carcinoma, and sessile appearance showed good performance for discriminating T1-CRC patients with LNM. The benefit-risk balance was in favor of surgery when at least two of these criteria were present.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID25700808
OpenAlexW2029009826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.