Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25700663›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2015

Comparison of different in vitro tests to detect Cryptococcus neoformans not susceptible to amphotericin B.

Susana Córdoba, Walter Vivot, Wanda Szusz, Guillermina Isla, Graciela Davel

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antifungal Resistance in Cryptococcal Infections.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Cryptococcus neoformans, a global threat to human health.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The status of cryptococcosis in Latin America.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susana CórdobaDepartamento Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas, "Dr. C. G. Malbrán", Av. Vélez Sarsfield 563, CP 1281, Buenos Aires, Argentina, scordoba@anlis.gov.ar.
Walter Vivot
Wanda Szusz
Guillermina Isla
Graciela Davel
Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections due to Cryptococcus neoformans cause severe disease, mostly in AIDS patients. The antifungal drug recommended for the initial treatment of these infections is amphotericin B with or without flucytosine, but treatment failure occurs, associated with high mortality. Thus, antifungal susceptibility testing is needed. However, the in vitro susceptibility tests available for C. neoformans are not useful to detect isolates that are not susceptible to antifungal agents such as amphotericin B. The aims of the present study were: (1) to determine and compare the in vitro activity of amphotericin B against C. neoformans clinical isolates by using different dilution and diffusion methods; (2) to evaluate the concordance among the methods used and the reference method; (3) to evaluate which method could be the best to correlate with the clinical outcome. The reference method EDef 7.2 from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and commercial Etest strips were used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration against amphotericin B. curves, minimal fungicidal concentration, and a disk diffusion method were also developed to evaluate the cidal activity of amphotericin B. The time-kill curve assay showed correlation (p < 0.05) with clinical outcome, whereas EDef 7.2, minimal fungicidal concentration, Etest, and disk diffusion showed no correlation (p > 0.05). Thus, the time-kill curve assay could be a potential tool to guide a more efficient treatment when amphotericin B is used.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalAdultAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformansFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAmphotericin BAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID25700663
OpenAlexW2079330813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.