Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25700087›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Activity of heat shock genes' promoters in thermally contrasting animal species.

Lyubov N Astakhova, Olga G Zatsepina, Sergei Yu Funikov, Elena S Zelentsova, Natalia G Schostak, Konstantin E Orishchenko, Michael B Evgen'ev, David G Garbuz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tunable gene expression in zebrafish using RiboSCALE.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lyubov N AstakhovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology RAS, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Olga G ZatsepinaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology RAS, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Sergei Yu FunikovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology RAS, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Elena S ZelentsovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology RAS, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Natalia G SchostakEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology RAS, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Konstantin E OrishchenkoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, The Siberian Branch of RAS, Prospekt Lavrentyeva 10,630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Michael B Evgen'evEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology RAS, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow, 119991, Russia; Institute of Cell Biophysics RAS, Pushchino, Moscow region, 142290, Russia.
David G GarbuzEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology RAS, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RUInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat shock gene promoters represent a highly conserved and universal system for the rapid induction of transcription after various stressful stimuli. We chose pairs of mammalian and insect species that significantly differ in their thermoresistance and constitutive levels of Hsp70 to compare hsp promoter strength under normal conditions and after heat shock (HS). The first pair includes the HSPA1 gene promoter of camel (Camelus dromedarius) and humans. It was demonstrated that the camel HSPA1A and HSPA1L promoters function normally in vitro in human cell cultures and exceed the strength of orthologous human promoters under basal conditions. We used the same in vitro assay for Drosophila melanogaster Schneider-2 (S2) cells to compare the activity of the hsp70 and hsp83 promoters of the second species pair represented by Diptera, i.e., Stratiomys singularior and D. melanogaster, which dramatically differ in thermoresistance and the pattern of Hsp70 accumulation. Promoter strength was also monitored in vivo in D. melanogaster strains transformed with constructs containing the S. singularior hsp70 ORF driven either by its own promoter or an orthologous promoter from the D. melanogaster hsp70Aa gene. Analysis revealed low S. singularior hsp70 promoter activity in vitro and in vivo under basal conditions and after HS in comparison with the endogenous promoter in D. melanogaster cells, which correlates with the absence of canonical GAGA elements in the promoters of the former species. Indeed, the insertion of GAGA elements into the S. singularior hsp70 regulatory region resulted in a dramatic increase in promoter activity in vitro but only modestly enhanced the promoter strength in the larvae of the transformed strains. In contrast with hsp70 promoters, hsp83 promoters from both of the studied Diptera species demonstrated high conservation and universality.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceCamelusCell LineDrosophila melanogasterGenes, ReporterHeat-Shock ProteinsHumansLuciferases, RenillaMolecular Sequence DataSpecies SpecificityTATA BoxTranscriptional ActivationHeat-Shock ProteinsLuciferases, Renilla

Identifiers

PMID25700087
PMCPMC4336284
OpenAlexW1975712644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.