SynthesisCirculation research2015
Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs (ACCRUE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction based on individual patient data.
Synthesis in Circulation research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01098591 (Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs), which is not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs: ACCRUE
Who cites it
163 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 302 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bone marrow-derived stem cells for acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiomyocyte regeneration therapy and its effect on LVEF and scar size- a systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Stem Cells Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Bioactive Scaffolds in Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Myocardial Infarction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Trials.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Pooled it
- A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Cardiac Regeneration Over a 20-Year Period.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of stem cell transplantation on patients with ischemic heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2019Pooled it
- Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Transfer for Patients after ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.Yonsei medical journal · 2018Pooled it
- A comprehensive meta-analysis of stem cell therapy for chronic angina.Clinical cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- Plasma endothelin-1-related peptides as the prognostic biomarkers for heart failure: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Stem cell therapy for chronic ischaemic heart disease and congestive heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Discrepancy between short-term and long-term effects of bone marrow-derived cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2016Pooled it
- Adult Stem Cell Therapy and Heart Failure, 2000 to 2016: A Systematic Review.JAMA cardiology · 2016Pooled it
- Meta-Analyses of Human Cell-Based Cardiac Regeneration Therapies: Controversies in Meta-Analyses Results on Cardiac Cell-Based Regenerative Studies.Circulation research · 2016Pooled it
- Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Cell-Based Therapy by Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cells for Bone Augmentation of Plate-Stabilized Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Multicentric, Randomized, Open Phase IIa study.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Trial
- Five-year follow-up of intracoronary autologous cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction: the REGENERATE-AMI trial.ESC heart failure · 2022Trial
- Effect of cardiosphere-derived cells on segmental myocardial function after myocardial infarction: ALLSTAR randomised clinical trial.Open heart · 2021Trial
- Effect of Intramyocardial Grafting Collagen Scaffold With Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
38 authors at 14 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleThe meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac study is the first prospectively declared collaborative multinational database, including individual data of patients with ischemic heart disease treated with cell therapy.
objectiveWe analyzed the safety and efficacy of intracoronary cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including individual patient data from 12 randomized trials (ASTAMI, Aalst, BOOST, BONAMI, CADUCEUS, FINCELL, REGENT, REPAIR-AMI, SCAMI, SWISS-AMI, TIME, LATE-TIME; n=1252). METHODS AND
resultsThe primary end point was freedom from combined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (including all-cause death, AMI recurrance, stroke, and target vessel revascularization). The secondary end point was freedom from hard clinical end points (death, AMI recurrence, or stroke), assessed with random-effects meta-analyses and Cox regressions for interactions. Secondary efficacy end points included changes in end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction, analyzed with random-effects meta-analyses and ANCOVA. We reported weighted mean differences between cell therapy and control groups. No effect of cell therapy on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (14.0% versus 16.3%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.18) or death (1.4% versus 2.1%) or death/AMI recurrence/stroke (2.9% versus 4.7%) was identified in comparison with controls. No changes in ejection fraction (mean difference: 0.96%; 95% confidence interval, -0.2 to 2.1), end-diastolic volume, or systolic volume were observed compared with controls. These results were not influenced by anterior AMI location, reduced baseline ejection fraction, or the use of MRI for assessing left ventricular parameters.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials in patients with recent AMI revealed that intracoronary cell therapy provided no benefit, in terms of clinical events or changes in left ventricular function. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01098591.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.