Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25699987›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology2014

Internal and External Feedback Circuits for Skilled Forelimb Movement.

Eiman Azim, Andrew J P Fink, Thomas M Jessell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Online control of reach accuracy in mice.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Gain control in the sensorimotor system.Current opinion in physiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Role of PIEZO2 in Human Mechanosensation.The New England journal of medicine · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eiman AzimDepartments of Neuroscience and Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032 tmj1@columbia.edu ea2471@columbia.edu.
Andrew J P FinkDepartments of Neuroscience and Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
Thomas M JessellDepartments of Neuroscience and Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032 tmj1@columbia.edu ea2471@columbia.edu.

Funding

CONTROL OF MOTOR NEURON DIFFERENTIATIONR01NS033245 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI JESSELL, THOMAS M. · 1994 to 2009
$3.3M
CONTROL OF MOTOR NEURON DIFFERENTIATIONR37NS033245 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JESSELL, THOMAS M. · 2010 to 2016
$2.4M
Control of Skilled Forelimb Movements by Cerebellar Feedback CircuitsR00NS088193 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI AZIM, EIMAN · 2016 to 2018
$747k
Control of Skilled Forelimb Movements by Cerebellar Feedback CircuitsK99NS088193 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI AZIM, EIMAN · 2014 to 2015
$180k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNINDS NIH HHS K99 NS088193NINDS NIH HHS NS033245NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS088193NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS033245NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS033245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skilled motor behavior emerges from interactions between efferent neural pathways that induce muscle contraction and feedback systems that report and refine movement. Two broad classes of feedback projections modify motor output, one from the periphery and a second that originates within the central nervous system. The mechanisms through which these pathways influence movement remain poorly understood, however. Here we discuss recent studies that delineate spinal circuitry that binds external and internal feedback pathways to forelimb motor behavior. A spinal presynaptic inhibitory circuit regulates the strength of external feedback, promoting limb stability during goal-directed reaching. A distinct excitatory propriospinal circuit conveys copies of motor commands to the cerebellum, establishing an internal feedback loop that rapidly modulates forelimb motor output. The behavioral consequences of manipulating these two circuits reveal distinct controls on motor performance and provide an initial insight into feedback strategies that underlie skilled forelimb movement.

Indexed as

FeedbackAnimalsForelimbHumansMotor ActivityMovementNerve NetSensation

Identifiers

PMID25699987
PMCPMC4475648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.