SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015
Oral lactoferrin for the prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Enteral lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes Related to the Gastrointestinal Trophic Effects of Erythropoietin in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Pooled it
- Standardized feeding regimen for reducing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: an updated systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017Pooled it
- Enteral lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Early Effect of Supplemented Infant Formulae on Intestinal Biomarkers and Microbiota: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Nutrients · 2020Trial
- A Mixed Lipid Emulsion for Prevention of Parenteral Nutrition Associated Cholestasis in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.The Journal of pediatrics · 2018Trial
- Bovine Lactoferrin Enhances TLR7-Mediated Responses in Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in Elderly Women: Results From a Nutritional Intervention Study With Bovine Lactoferrin, GOS and Vitamin D.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Trial
- Lactoferrin concentration in breast milk of mothers of low-birth-weight newborns.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017Trial
- Factors influencing preterm infant microbiota and their role in wheezing development.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Growth inhibition of common neonatal pathogens differs between bovine lactoferrin products.Journal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
- Different infant formulas can activate toll-like receptor 9 in vitro and inhibit interleukin 6 in human primary intestinal epithelial cells.European journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- An anti-eCIRP strategy for necrotizing enterocolitis.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial Properties of Colostrum and Milk.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- Transcriptomic analysis identifies lactoferrin-induced quiescent circuits in neonatal macrophages.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Can Lactoferrin, a Natural Mammalian Milk Protein, Assist in the Battle against COVID-19?Nutrients · 2022Review
- Bovine Colostrum Treatment of Specific Cancer Types: Current Evidence and Future Opportunities.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Lactoferrin and Human Neutrophil Protein (HNP) 1-3 Levels During the Neonatal Period in Preterm Infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLactoferrin, a normal component of human colostrum and milk, can enhance host defense and may be effective in the prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm neonates.
objectivesPrimary objective To assess the safety and effectiveness of oral lactoferrin in the prevention of sepsis and NEC in preterm neonates. Secondary objectives1. To determine the effects of oral lactoferrin used to prevent neonatal sepsis and/or NEC on duration of positive-pressure ventilation, development of chronic lung disease (CLD) or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), length of hospital stay to discharge among survivors, and adverse neurological outcomes at two years of age or later.2. To determine the adverse effects of oral lactoferrin in the prophylaxis of neonatal sepsis and/or NEC.When data were available, we analyzed the following subgroups.1. Gestational age < 32 weeks and 32 to 36 weeks.2. Birth weight < 1000 g (extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants) and birth weight < 1500 g (very low birth weight (VLBW) infants).3. Type of feeding: breast milk versus formula milk. SEARCH
methodsWe used the search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group (CNRG) and updated our search in July 2014. We searched the databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), as well as trials registries and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating oral lactoferrin at any dose or duration to prevent sepsis or NEC in preterm neonates. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors used standard methods of the CNRG. MAIN
resultsFour RCTs are included in this review. Oral lactoferrin supplementation decreased late-onset sepsis (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.73; typical risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.04; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 11, 95% CI 7 to 25; four trials, 678 participants, moderate-quality evidence), NEC stage II or greater (typical RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.76; typical RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.01; NNTB 20, 95% CI 12.5 to 100; two studies, 505 participants, low-quality evidence), and "all-cause mortality" (typical RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.75; typical RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.01; NNTB 20, 95% CI 12.5 to 100; two studies, 505 participants, low-quality evidence).Oral lactoferrin supplementation with a probiotic decreased late-onset sepsis (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.60; RD -0.13, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.06; NNTB 8, 95% CI 5 to 17; one study, 321 participants, low-quality evidence) and NEC stage II or greater (RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.62; RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.03; NNTB 20, 95% CI 12.5 to 33.3; one study, 496 participants, low-quality evidence), but not "all-cause mortality."Oral lactoferrin with or without probiotics decreased fungal sepsis but not chronic lung disease or length of hospital stay (from one study, low-quality evidence). No adverse effects were reported. Long-term neurological outcomes or periventricular leukomalacia was not evaluated. AUTHORS'
conclusionsEvidence of moderate to low quality suggests that oral lactoferrin prophylaxis with or without probiotics decreases late-onset sepsis and NEC stage II or greater in preterm infants without adverse effects. Completion of ongoing trials will provide evidence from more than 6000 preterm neonates and may enhance the quality of the evidence. Clarifications regarding optimum dosing regimens, type of lactoferrin (human or bovine), and long-term outcomes are still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25699678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.