Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25699257›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2015

The regulation of MMP targeting to invadopodia during cancer metastasis.

Abitha Jacob, Rytis Prekeris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 191 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Targeting breast tumor extracellular matrix and stroma utilizing nanoparticles.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abitha JacobDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver Aurora, CO, USA.
Rytis PrekerisDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Epithelial Cell Apical Polarity and CiliogenesisR01DK064380 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Rytis Prekeris · 2004 to 2026
$7.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK064380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dissemination of cancer cells from the primary tumor to a distant site, known as metastasis, is the main cause of mortality in cancer patients. Metastasis is a very complex cellular process that involves many steps, including the breaching of the basement membrane (BM) to allow the movement of cells through tissues. The BM breach occurs via highly regulated and localized remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which is mediated by formation of structures, known as invadopodia, and targeted secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Recently, invadopodia have emerged as key cellular structures that regulate the metastasis of many cancers. Furthermore, targeting of various cytoskeletal modulators and MMPs has been shown to play a major role in regulating invadopodia function. Here, we highlight recent findings regarding the regulation of protein targeting during invadopodia formation and function.

Indexed as

cancerinvadopodiamembrane trafficmetastasisMMP2MMP9Rab40B

Identifiers

PMID25699257
PMCPMC4313772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.