Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25699180›Full record

ReviewMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine2014

Health and social impacts of COPD and the problem of under-diagnosis.

Stefano Carlone, Bruno Balbi, Michela Bezzi, Marco Brunori, Stefano Calabro, Maria Pia Foschino Barbaro, Claudio Micheletto, Salvatore Privitera, Roberto Torchio, Pietro Schino and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano CarlonePulmonary Department, San Giovanni-Addolorata General Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Bruno BalbiPulmonary Rehabilitation Department, IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Veruno (NO), Italy.
Michela BezziEndoscopy and Laser Therapy, Respiratory Unit, Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Marco BrunoriRespiratory Pathophysiology and Rehabilitation Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Stefano CalabroRespiratory Unit, San Bassano Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Vicenza Italy.
Maria Pia Foschino BarbaroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Claudio MichelettoRespiratory Unit, Mater Salutis Hospital, Legnago, Verona Italy.
Salvatore PriviteraCentre for Prevention and Monitoring Respiratory Failure, ASP, Catania, Italy.
Roberto TorchioRespiratory Function and Sleep Laboratory, AOU S. Luigi, Orbassano (TO), Italy.
Pietro SchinoPhysiopatology Respiratory Unit, General Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy.
Andrea VianelloRespiratory Pathophysiology Division, University-City Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata · ITFondazione Salvatore Maugeri · ITOspedale Generale Regionale Francesco Miulli · ITOspedale San Bassiano · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article deals with the prevalence and the possible reasons of COPD underestimation in the population and gives suggestions on how to overcome the obstacles and make the correct diagnosis in order to provide the patients with the appropriate therapy. COPD is diagnosed in later or very advanced stages. In Italy the rate of COPD under-diagnosis ranges between 25 and 50% and, as a consequence, the patient does not consult his doctor until the symptoms have worsened, mainly due to exacerbations. A missed diagnosis influences the timing of therapeutic intervention, thus contributing to the evolution into more severe stages of the illness. An incisive intervention to limit under-diagnosis cannot act only in remittance (passive diagnosis), but must be the promoter for a series of preventive actions: primary, secondary and rehabilitative. To reduce under-diagnosis, some actions need to be taken, such as screening programs for smokers subjects, use of questionnaires aimed to qualify and monitor the disease severity, spirometry, early diagnosis. There is a consensus regarding diagnoses based on screening of at-risk subjects and symptoms, rather than screening of the general population. In practice, all individuals over 40 years of age with risk factors should make a spirometry test. Screening actions on a national scale can be the following: compilation of questionnaires in waiting rooms of doctor's offices or performing simple maneuvers to evaluate the expiratory force at pharmacies. It is now widely recognized that COPD is a complex syndrome with several pulmonary and extrapulmonary components; as a result, the airway obstruction as assessed by FEV1 by itself does not adequately describe the complexity of the disease and FEV1 cannot be used alone for the optimal diagnosis, assessment, and management of the disease. The identification and subsequent grouping of key elements of the COPD syndrome into clinically meaningful and useful subgroups (phenotypes) can guide therapy more effectively. In conclusion, we firmly believe that an early and correct diagnosis can influence positively the progress of the disease (lowering the lung function impairment), decrease the risk of exacerbations, relieve symptoms and increase the patients' quality of life leading also to a decrease in costs associated to the exacerbations and hospitalization of the patient.

Indexed as

COPDEarly diagnosisIndicatorsPhenotypeSpirometryUnderestimation

Identifiers

PMID25699180
PMCPMC4334408
OpenAlexW2117785490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.