ArticleTheranostics2015
Targeted antiangiogenesis gene therapy using targeted cationic microbubbles conjugated with CD105 antibody compared with untargeted cationic and neutral microbubbles.
Article in Theranostics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Cationic microbubble loading hSIRT3 and hTIMP3 optimize cardiac-targeted delivery and myocardial protection in the porcine MI/R model.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-mediated nanomaterials for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2025Review
- Advances in Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction (UTMD) for Breast Cancer Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Ultrasound-targeted microbubble technology facilitates SAHH gene delivery to treat diabetic cardiomyopathy by activating AMPK pathway.iScience · 2024Article
- TME-Responsive Nanoplatform with Glutathione Depletion for Enhanced Tumor-Specific Mild Photothermal/Gene/Ferroptosis Synergistic Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- An Acoustic Device for Ultra High-Speed Quantification of Cell Strain During Cell-Microbubble Interaction.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023Article
- Targeted Microbubbles for Drug, Gene, and Cell Delivery in Therapy and Immunotherapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Barrier-breaking effects of ultrasonic cavitation for drug delivery and biomarker release.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2023Article
- Nanobubble-based anti-hepatocellular carcinoma therapy combining immune check inhibitors and sonodynamic therapy.Nanoscale advances · 2022Article
- CD105: tumor diagnosis, prognostic marker and future tumor therapeutic target.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022Review
- Ultrasound-targeted cationic microbubble-mediated gene transfection and inhibition of retinal neovascularization.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Janus USPION modular platform (JUMP) for theranostic ultrasound-mediated targeted intratumoral microvascular imaging and DNA/miRNA delivery.Theranostics · 2022Article
- Ultrasonic particles: An approach for targeted gene delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021Review
- Ultrasonic technologies in imaging and drug delivery.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- Is the Fixed Periodic Treatment Effective for the Tumor System without Complete Information?Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Nanobubbles Containing sPD-1 and Ce6 Mediate Combination Immunotherapy and Suppress Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Mice.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Article
- Microbubbles and Nanobubbles with Ultrasound for Systemic Gene Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- CD105 is a prognostic marker and valid endothelial target for microbubble platforms in cholangiocarcinoma.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- In vivo gene delivery mediated by non-viral vectors for cancer therapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop targeted cationic microbubbles conjugated with a CD105 antibody (CMB105) for use in targeted vascular endothelial cell gene therapy and ultrasound imaging. We compared the results with untargeted cationic microbubbles (CMB) and neutral microbubbles (NMB).
methodsCMB105 were prepared and compared with untargeted CMB and NMB. First, the microbubbles were characterized in terms of size, zeta-potential, antibody binding ability and plasmid DNA loading capacity. A tumor model of subcutaneous breast cancer in nude mice was used for our experiments. The ability of different types of microbubbles to target HUVECs in vitro and tumor neovascularization in vivo was measured. The endostatin gene was selected for its outstanding antiangiogenesis effect. For in vitro experiments, the transfection efficiency and cell cycle were analyzed using flow cytometry, and the transcription and expression of endostatin were measured by qPCR and Western blotting, respectively. Vascular tube cavity formation and tumor cell invasion were used to evaluate the antiangiogenesis gene therapy efficiency in vitro. Tumors were exposed to ultrasound irradiation with different types of microbubbles, and the gene therapy effects were investigated by detecting apoptosis induction and changes in tumor volume.
resultsCMB105 and CMB differed significantly from NMB in terms of zeta-potential, and the DNA loading capacities were 16.76±1.75 μg, 18.21±1.22 μg, and 0.48±0.04 μg per 5×10(8) microbubbles, respectively. The charge coupling of plasmid DNA to CMB105 was not affected by the presence of the CD105 antibody. Both CMB105 and CMB could target to HUVECs in vitro, whereas only CMB105 could target to tumor neovascularization in vivo. In in vitro experiments, the transfection efficiency of CMB105 was 24.7-fold higher than the transfection efficiency of NMB and 1.47-fold higher than the transfection efficiency of CMB (P<0.05). With ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD)-mediated gene therapy, the transcription and expression of endostatin were the highest in the CMB105 group (P<0.001); the antiangiogenesis effect and inhibition of tumor cells invasion was better with CMB105 than CMB or NMB in vitro (P<0.01). After gene therapy, the tumor volumes of CMB105 group were significantly smaller than that of CMB and NMB, and many tumor cells had begun apoptosis in the CMB105 group, which had the highest apoptosis index (P<0.001).
conclusionsAs a contrast agent and plasmid carrier, CMB105 can be used not only for targeted ultrasound imaging but also for targeted gene therapy both in vitro and in vivo. The plasmid DNA binding ability of the CMB was not affected by conjugation of the CMB with the CD105 antibody, and because of its targeting ability, the gene transfection efficiency and therapeutic effect were better compared with the untargeted CMB and NMB. The advantages of targeted gene therapy with CMB105 in vivo were more prominent than with CMB or NMB because neither can target the endothelia in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.