Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25699099›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2015

Targeted antiangiogenesis gene therapy using targeted cationic microbubbles conjugated with CD105 antibody compared with untargeted cationic and neutral microbubbles.

Yu Zhou, Haitao Gu, Yan Xu, Fan Li, Shaojing Kuang, Zhigang Wang, Xiyuan Zhou, Huafeng Ma, Pan Li, Yuanyi Zheng and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. CD105: tumor diagnosis, prognostic marker and future tumor therapeutic target.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Ultrasonic technologies in imaging and drug delivery.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. In vivo gene delivery mediated by non-viral vectors for cancer therapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yu Zhou1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Haitao Gu3. Department of Gastrointestinal & Anorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Yan Xu1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Fan Li4. Department of Endocrine & Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P. R. China.
Shaojing Kuang5. Department of Otolaryngology, The Third People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 400014, P. R. China.
Zhigang Wang1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Xiyuan Zhou6. Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Huafeng Ma6. Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Pan Li1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Yuanyi Zheng1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Haitao Ran1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Jia Jian6. Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Yajing Zhao1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Weixiang Song1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China.
Qiushi Wang7. Chongqing Jinxin Advertisement Company, Chongqing Daily News Group, Chongqing 400012, P. R. China.
Dong Wang2. Department of Ultrasound, The Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400014, P. R. China.
Dalian Medical University · CNChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNChongqing Construction Engineering Investment Holding (China) · CNThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNThird People 's Hospital of Chongqing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop targeted cationic microbubbles conjugated with a CD105 antibody (CMB105) for use in targeted vascular endothelial cell gene therapy and ultrasound imaging. We compared the results with untargeted cationic microbubbles (CMB) and neutral microbubbles (NMB).

methodsCMB105 were prepared and compared with untargeted CMB and NMB. First, the microbubbles were characterized in terms of size, zeta-potential, antibody binding ability and plasmid DNA loading capacity. A tumor model of subcutaneous breast cancer in nude mice was used for our experiments. The ability of different types of microbubbles to target HUVECs in vitro and tumor neovascularization in vivo was measured. The endostatin gene was selected for its outstanding antiangiogenesis effect. For in vitro experiments, the transfection efficiency and cell cycle were analyzed using flow cytometry, and the transcription and expression of endostatin were measured by qPCR and Western blotting, respectively. Vascular tube cavity formation and tumor cell invasion were used to evaluate the antiangiogenesis gene therapy efficiency in vitro. Tumors were exposed to ultrasound irradiation with different types of microbubbles, and the gene therapy effects were investigated by detecting apoptosis induction and changes in tumor volume.

resultsCMB105 and CMB differed significantly from NMB in terms of zeta-potential, and the DNA loading capacities were 16.76±1.75 μg, 18.21±1.22 μg, and 0.48±0.04 μg per 5×10(8) microbubbles, respectively. The charge coupling of plasmid DNA to CMB105 was not affected by the presence of the CD105 antibody. Both CMB105 and CMB could target to HUVECs in vitro, whereas only CMB105 could target to tumor neovascularization in vivo. In in vitro experiments, the transfection efficiency of CMB105 was 24.7-fold higher than the transfection efficiency of NMB and 1.47-fold higher than the transfection efficiency of CMB (P<0.05). With ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD)-mediated gene therapy, the transcription and expression of endostatin were the highest in the CMB105 group (P<0.001); the antiangiogenesis effect and inhibition of tumor cells invasion was better with CMB105 than CMB or NMB in vitro (P<0.01). After gene therapy, the tumor volumes of CMB105 group were significantly smaller than that of CMB and NMB, and many tumor cells had begun apoptosis in the CMB105 group, which had the highest apoptosis index (P<0.001).

conclusionsAs a contrast agent and plasmid carrier, CMB105 can be used not only for targeted ultrasound imaging but also for targeted gene therapy both in vitro and in vivo. The plasmid DNA binding ability of the CMB was not affected by conjugation of the CMB with the CD105 antibody, and because of its targeting ability, the gene transfection efficiency and therapeutic effect were better compared with the untargeted CMB and NMB. The advantages of targeted gene therapy with CMB105 in vivo were more prominent than with CMB or NMB because neither can target the endothelia in vivo.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesAnimalsAntibodiesCells, CulturedDNADrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsEndoglinEndostatinsEndothelial CellsGenetic TherapyHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMice, NudeNeovascularization, PathologicPlasmidsAntibodiesDNADrug CarriersEndoglinEndostatinsEng protein, mouseIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsAntiangiogenesisCationic microbubblesTargetUltrasound-mediated gene delivery (UMGD)

Identifiers

PMID25699099
PMCPMC4329503
OpenAlexW2153089700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.