Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25699024›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

The archaellum: how Archaea swim.

Sonja-Verena Albers, Ken F Jarrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of bacteriology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Form and function in biological filaments: a physicist's review.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Species-specific surface dwell times and accumulation of microbes investigated by holographic microscopy.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. How Does the Archaellum Work?Biomolecules · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Development of a genetic system forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Membrane Adaptations and Cellular Responses ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Membrane lipid and expression responses ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sonja-Verena AlbersMolecular Biology of Archaea, Institute of Biology II-Microbiology, University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany ; Molecular Biology of Archaea, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology , Marburg, Germany.
Ken F JarrellDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University , Kingston, ON, Canada.

Funding

European Research Council 311523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies on archaeal motility have shown that the archaeal motility structure is unique in several aspects. Although it fulfills the same swimming function as the bacterial flagellum, it is evolutionarily and structurally related to the type IV pilus. This was the basis for the recent proposal to term the archaeal motility structure the "archaellum." This review illustrates the key findings that led to the realization that the archaellum was a novel motility structure and presents the current knowledge about the structural composition, mechanism of assembly and regulation, and the posttranslational modifications of archaella.

Indexed as

archaeal flagellumarchaellummotilitymotor complextype IV pili

Identifiers

PMID25699024
PMCPMC4307647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.