Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25699009›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2015

Dissociation of Pupillary Post-Illumination Responses from Visual Function in Confirmed OPA1 c.983A > G and c.2708_2711delTTAG Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy.

Claus Nissen, Cecilia Rönnbäck, Birgit Sander, Kristina Herbst, Dan Milea, Michael Larsen, Henrik Lund-Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Factors influencing the pupillary light reflex in healthy individuals.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claus NissenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Cecilia RönnbäckDepartment of Ophthalmology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Birgit SanderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Kristina HerbstDepartment of Ophthalmology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Dan MileaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark ; Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore , Singapore , Singapore ; Angers University Hospital , Angers , France.
Michael LarsenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Henrik Lund-AndersenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo test whether the melanopsin-containing, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), as evaluated by examination of the pupillary light reflex (PLR), are preserved in genetically confirmed autosomal dominant optic atrophy (ADOA).

methodTwenty-nine patients with either the c.983A > G (n = 14) or the c.2708_ 2711delTTAG mutation (n = 15) were examined with monochromatic pupillometry, using isoluminant (300 cd/m(2)), red (660 nm) or blue (470 nm) light, optical coherence tomography, automated visual field analysis, and with determination of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Since we examined two different mutations, initially we compared all outcome variables between the two, and finding no statistically significant difference, pooled them.

resultsDespite a poor BCVA (56 letters, ETDRS) in the ADOA patients, their post-illuminatory pupil responses did not differ significantly from those of healthy controls (blue, p = 0.45, red, p = 0.49, t-test), and no statistically significant effect was noted of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness, or age.

conclusionThe PLR to blue light of high luminance (300 cd/m(2)) was preserved in both c.983A > G and c.2708_2711delTTAG ADOA despite severe visual loss and optic nerve atrophy. The study confirms, in a large sample of two genetically homogenous groups, that the ipRGCs are spared in ADOA.

Indexed as

autosomal dominant optic atrophyintrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cellsipRGCmelanopsinpupillary light reflex

Identifiers

PMID25699009
PMCPMC4316714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.