Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25698974›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2015

Functional role of voltage gated Ca(2+) channels in heart automaticity.

Pietro Mesirca, Angelo G Torrente, Matteo E Mangoni

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Aging Disrupts L-type CaCirculation research · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Selective blockade of CaNature communications · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathophysiology of CaFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Heart rate reduction after genetic ablation of L-type CaFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pietro MesircaLaboratory of Excellence in Ion Channel Science and Therapeutics, Département de Physiologie, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle Montpellier, France ; UMR-5203, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universités de Montpellier 1 and 2 Montpellier, France ; INSERM U 1191, Département de Physiologie, Universités de Montpellier 1 and 2 Montpellier, France.
Angelo G TorrenteLaboratory of Excellence in Ion Channel Science and Therapeutics, Département de Physiologie, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle Montpellier, France ; UMR-5203, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universités de Montpellier 1 and 2 Montpellier, France ; INSERM U 1191, Département de Physiologie, Universités de Montpellier 1 and 2 Montpellier, France.
Matteo E MangoniLaboratory of Excellence in Ion Channel Science and Therapeutics, Département de Physiologie, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle Montpellier, France ; UMR-5203, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universités de Montpellier 1 and 2 Montpellier, France ; INSERM U 1191, Département de Physiologie, Universités de Montpellier 1 and 2 Montpellier, France.
Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle · FRLaboratoire d'Excellence Canaux Ioniques d'Intérêt Thérapeutique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pacemaker activity of automatic cardiac myocytes controls the heartbeat in everyday life. Cardiac automaticity is under the control of several neurotransmitters and hormones and is constantly regulated by the autonomic nervous system to match the physiological needs of the organism. Several classes of ion channels and proteins involved in intracellular Ca(2+) dynamics contribute to pacemaker activity. The functional role of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) in heart automaticity and impulse conduction has been matter of debate for 30 years. However, growing evidence shows that VGCCs are important regulators of the pacemaker mechanisms and play also a major role in atrio-ventricular impulse conduction. Incidentally, studies performed in genetically modified mice lacking L-type Cav1.3 (Cav1.3(-/-)) or T-type Cav3.1 (Cav3.1(-/-)) channels show that genetic inactivation of these channels strongly impacts pacemaking. In cardiac pacemaker cells, VGCCs activate at negative voltages at the beginning of the diastolic depolarization and importantly contribute to this phase by supplying inward current. Loss-of-function of these channels also impairs atrio-ventricular conduction. Furthermore, inactivation of Cav1.3 channels promotes also atrial fibrillation and flutter in knockout mice suggesting that these channels can play a role in stabilizing atrial rhythm. Genomic analysis demonstrated that Cav1.3 and Cav3.1 channels are widely expressed in pacemaker tissue of mice, rabbits and humans. Importantly, human diseases of pacemaker activity such as congenital bradycardia and heart block have been attributed to loss-of-function of Cav1.3 and Cav3.1 channels. In this article, we will review the current knowledge on the role of VGCCs in the generation and regulation of heart rate and rhythm. We will discuss also how loss of Ca(2+) entry through VGCCs could influence intracellular Ca(2+) handling and promote atrial arrhythmias.

Indexed as

atrioventricular nodeheart automaticityL-type Ca2+ channelsinoatrial nodeT-type Ca2+ channels

Identifiers

PMID25698974
PMCPMC4313592
OpenAlexW2028736390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.