ArticleGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2015
Risk of hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes patients under different insulin regimens: a primary care database analysis.
Article in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insulin Matters: A Practical Approach to Basal Insulin Management in Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2018Article
- Has the safety of diabetes therapy improved? Lessons from an analysis of diabetic medication-induced severe hypoglycemic cases in an emergency department from 2005 to 2013.Diabetology international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo compare rates and predictors of documented hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes patients treated with either basal insulin supported oral therapy (BOT), conventional therapy (CT) or supplementary insulin therapy (SIT) in primary care.
methodsData from 10,842 anonymous patients (mean age ± SD: 54 ± 8 yrs) on BOT, 2,407 subjects (56 ± 7 yrs) on CT, and 7,480 patients (52 ± 10 yrs) using SIT from 1,198 primary care practices were retrospectively analyzed (Disease Analyzer, Germany: 01/2005-07/2013). Stepwise logistic regression (≥1 documented hypoglycaemia: ICD code) was used to evaluate risk factors of hypoglycemia.
resultsThe unadjusted rates (95% CI) per 100 patient-years of documented hypoglycaemia were 1.01 (0.80-1.20) (BOT), 1.68 (1.10-2.30) (CT), and 1.61 (1.30-1.90) (SIT), respectively. The odds of having ≥1 hypoglycemia was increased for CT (OR; 95% CI: 1.71; 1.13-2.58) and SIT (1.55; 1.15-2.08) (reference: BOT). Previous hypoglycemia (OR: 11.24; 6.71-18.85), duration of insulin treatment (days) (1.06; 1.05-1.07), history of transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke (1.91; 1.04-3.50), and former salicylate prescriptions (1.44; 1.06-1.98) also showed an increased odds of having hypoglycemia. Higher age was associated with a slightly lower odds ratio (per year: 0.98; 0.97-0.99).
conclusionsInsulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients in primary care, initiated with CT and SIT have an increased risk of hypoglycaemia compared to BOT, which is in line with previous randomized controlled trials. As hypoglycaemic events are associated with an increased mortality risk, this real-world finding is of clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.