Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25698736›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Cell assemblies of the basal forebrain.

David Tingley, Andrew S Alexander, Laleh K Quinn, Andrea A Chiba, Douglas A Nitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Regulation Effect ofMediators of inflammation · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Forebrain Cholinergic Signaling: Wired and Phasic, Not Tonic, and Causing Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Specific Basal Forebrain-Cortical Cholinergic Circuits Coordinate Cognitive Operations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David TingleyUniversity of California, San Diego Department of Cognitive Science, San Diego, California 92093-0515, and NYU Neuroscience Institute, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York 10016.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4263-0476
Andrew S AlexanderUniversity of California, San Diego Department of Cognitive Science, San Diego, California 92093-0515, and.
Laleh K QuinnUniversity of California, San Diego Department of Cognitive Science, San Diego, California 92093-0515, and.
Andrea A ChibaUniversity of California, San Diego Department of Cognitive Science, San Diego, California 92093-0515, and.
Douglas A NitzUniversity of California, San Diego Department of Cognitive Science, San Diego, California 92093-0515, and dnitz@ucsd.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basal forebrain comprises several heterogeneous neuronal subgroupings having modular projection patterns to discrete sets of cortical subregions. Each cortical region forms recurrent projections, via prefrontal cortex, that reach the specific basal forebrain subgroups from which they receive afferents. This architecture enables the basal forebrain to selectively modulate cortical responsiveness according to current processing demands. Theoretically, optimal functioning of this distributed network would be enhanced by temporal coordination among coactive basal forebrain neurons, or the emergence of "cell assemblies." The present work demonstrates assembly formation in rat basal forebrain neuronal populations during a selective attention task. Neuron pairs exhibited coactivation patterns organized within beta-frequency time windows (55 ms), regardless of their membership within distinct bursting versus nonbursting basal forebrain subpopulations. Thus, the results reveal a specific temporal framework for integration of information within basal forebrain networks and for the modulation of cortical responsiveness.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAttentionBasal ForebrainBeta RhythmMaleNerve NetNeuronsPhotic StimulationRatsSpace PerceptionTime Factorsassemblybetacorticopetalgeneralized linear model

Identifiers

PMID25698736
PMCPMC6605588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.