ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2015
Space perception of strabismic observers in the real world environment.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Absolute Distance Discrimination in the Intermediate Distance Mediated by Angular Declination/Elevation and Binocular Disparity Cues.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- First-order basis of second-order temporal loss in amblyopia.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Increasing myopic refraction reduces random dot stereopsis in Chinese myopic patients: a cross-sectional study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Perception of distance during self-motion depends on the brain's internal model of the terrain.PloS one · 2025Article
- Decreased scene-selective activity within the posterior intraparietal cortex in amblyopic adults.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Factors Affecting Stimulus Duration Threshold for Depth Discrimination of Asynchronous Targets in the Intermediate Distance Range.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Decreased scene-selective activity within the posterior intraparietal cortex in amblyopic adults.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- From pictures to reality: modelling the phenomenology and psychophysics of 3D perception.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Objective assessment of eye alignment and disparity-driven vergence in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- The foggy effect of egocentric distance in a nonverbal paradigm.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Egocentric Distance Perception Disorder in Amblyopia.Psychologica Belgica · 2021Article
- Unimpaired perception of relative depth from perspective cues in strabismus.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Driving Skills Tested on Simulator After Strabismus Surgery: A Prospective Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Contributions of monocular and binocular cues to distance discrimination in natural scenes.Journal of vision · 2018Article
- Does stereopsis account for the link between motor and social skills in adults?Molecular autism · 2018Article
- A proto-object based saliency model in three-dimensional space.Vision research · 2016Article
- Attention modulates perception of visual space.Nature human behaviour · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSpace perception beyond the near distance range (>2 m) is important for target localization, and for directing and guiding a variety of daily activities, including driving and walking. However, it is unclear whether the absolute (egocentric) localization of a single target in the intermediate distance range requires binocular vision, and if so, whether having subnormal stereopsis in strabismus impairs one's ability to localize the target.
methodsWe investigated this by measuring the perceived absolute location of a target by observers with normal binocular vision (n = 8; mean age, 24.5 years) and observers with strabismus (n = 8; mean age, 24.9 years) under monocular and binocular conditions. The observers used the blind walking-gesturing task to indicate the judged location of a target located at various viewing distances (2.73-6.93 m) and heights (0, 30, and 90 cm) above the floor. Near stereopsis was assessed with the Randot Stereotest.
resultsBoth groups of observers accurately judged the absolute distance of the target on the ground (height = 0 cm) either with monocular or binocular viewing. However, when the target was suspended in midair, the normal observers accurately judged target location with binocular viewing, but not with monocular viewing (mean slant angle, 0.8° ± 0.5° vs. 7.4° ± 1.4°; P < 0.001, with a slant angle of 0° representing accurate localization). In contrast, the strabismic observers with poorer stereo acuity made larger errors in target localization in both viewing conditions, though with fewer errors during binocular viewing (mean slant angle, 2.7° ± 0.4° vs. 9.2° ± 1.3°; P < 0.0025). Further analysis reveals the localization error, that is, slant angle, correlates positively with stereo threshold during binocular viewing (r(2) = 0.479, P < 0.005), but not during monocular viewing (r(2) = 0.0002, P = 0.963).
conclusionsLocating a single target on the ground is sufficient with monocular depth information, but binocular depth information is required when the target is suspended in midair. Since the absolute binocular disparity information of the single target is weak beyond 2 m, we suggest the visual system localizes the single target using the relative binocular disparity information between the midair target and the visible ground surface. Consequently, strabismic observers with residual stereopsis localize a target more accurately than their counterparts without stereo ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.