ArticleEmergency radiology2015
Skull fractures in pediatric patients on computerized tomogram: comparison between routing bone window images and 3D volume-rendered images.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of computed tomography of the head to evaluate for skull fractures in infants with suspected non-accidental trauma.Pediatric radiology · 2017Article
- Image Quality Required for the Diagnosis of Skull Fractures Using Head CT: A Comparison of Conventional and Improved Reconstruction Kernels.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skull fracture is a common finding following head trauma. It has a prognostic significance and its presence points to severe trauma. Additionally, there is a greater possibility of detecting associated small underlying extra-axial hematomas and subtle injuries to the brain parenchyma. In pediatric patients, the presence of multiple open sutures often makes fracture evaluation challenging. In our experience, 3D volume (3DV)-rendered CT images complement routine axial bone window (RBW) images in detection and characterization of fractures. This is a multi-reader, multi-case, paired retrospective study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of RBW and 3DV images in detection of calvarial fractures in pediatric patients. A total of 60 cases (22 with fractures and 38 without) were analyzed. Two experienced neuroradiologists and a radiology trainee were the readers of the study. For all readers, the sensitivity was not statistically different between the RBW and the 3DV interpretations. For each reader, there was a statistically significant difference in the interpretation times between the RBW and the 3DV viewing formats. A greater number of sutural diastasis was identified on 3DV. We propose that 3DV images should be part of routine head trauma imaging, especially in the pediatric age group. It requires minimal post-processing time and no additional radiation. Furthermore, 3DV images help in reducing the interpretation time and also enhance the ability of the radiologist to characterize the calvarial fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25698562What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.