Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25698486›Full record

ArticleVaccine2015

Comparative evaluation of the protective efficacy of two formulations of a recombinant Chlamydia abortus subunit candidate vaccine in a mouse model.

Qing Pan, Roshan Pais, Adaugo Ohandjo, Cheng He, Qing He, Yusuf Omosun, J U Igietseme, F O Eko

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A VCG-Based MultiepitopeBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  3. Comparison of the immune effects of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Efficacy of TwoVaccines · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qing PanDepartment of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Roshan PaisDepartment of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Adaugo OhandjoDepartment of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Cheng HeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Qing HeDepartment of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yusuf OmosunDepartment of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J U IgietsemeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
F O EkoDepartment of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: feko@msm.edu.

Funding

LYMPHOEPITHELIAL INTERACTION DURING CHLAMYDIAL INFECTIONR01AI041231 · NIAID · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI EKO, FRANCIS O. · 1996 to 2014
$3.8M
RENOV OF MEDICAL SCI &EDUCATION BLDGS: RETINAL CELLSC06RR018386 · NCRR · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SULLIVAN, LOUIS W. · 2002 to 2002
$1.3M
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR018386NIAID NIH HHS AI41231NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI041231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia abortus (C. abortus) is the causative agent of ovine enzootic abortion (OEA) and poses a zoonotic risk to pregnant women. Current live attenuated 1B vaccines are efficacious but cause disease in vaccinated animals and inactivated vaccines are only marginally protective. We tested the ability of a new C. abortus subunit vaccine candidate based on the conserved and immunogenic polymorphic membrane protein D (Pmp18D) formulated in CpG1826+FL (Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 Ligand; Flt3L) or Vibrio cholerae ghosts (VCG) to induce innate and cross protective immunity against genital C. abortus infection. We found that delivery of rPmp18D with VCG was more effective than with CpG+FL in up-regulating the expression of molecules critically involved in T cell activation and differentiation, including MHC II, CD40, CD80, and CD86, activation of TLRs and NLRP3 inflammasome engagement, and secretion of IL-1β and TNF-α but not IL-10 and IL-4. rVCG-Pmp18D-immunized mice elicited more robust antigen-specific IFN-γ, IgA and IgG2c antibody responses compared to CpG+FL-delivered rPmp18D. Based on the number of mice with positive vaginal cultures, length of vaginal shedding, and number of inclusion forming units recovered following challenge with the heterologous C. abortus strain B577, vaccine delivery with VCG induced superior protective immunity than delivery with a combination of CpG1826 and FL, a nasal DC-targeting adjuvant. These results demonstrate that the ability of VCG to enhance protective immunity against genital C. abortus infection is superior to that of CpG+FL adjuvants.

Indexed as

Cross ProtectionAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial VaccinesChlamydiaChlamydia InfectionsDendritic CellsDisease Models, AnimalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleImmunity, InnateMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOligodeoxyribonucleotidesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, BacterialBacterial VaccinesCPG-oligonucleotideOligodeoxyribonucleotidesToll-Like ReceptorsVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticChlamydia abortusCross protectionImmunityPmp18DVaccine delivery

Identifiers

PMID25698486
PMCPMC4380638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.