Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25698456›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2015

An examination of prostate cancer trends in Australia, England, Canada and USA: Is the Australian death rate too high?

E Feletto, A Bang, D Cole-Clark, V Chalasani, K Rasiah, D P Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changes in the uptake of screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen in Ontario between 2003 to 2012.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
  10. Changements dans les pratiques de dépistage de l'antigène prostatique spécifique en Ontario entre 2003 et 2012.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

E FelettoCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia. eleonoraf@nswcc.org.au.
A BangCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia. albertb@nswcc.org.au.
D Cole-ClarkDepartment of Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia. dane.coleclark1@my.nd.edu.au.
V ChalasaniAustralian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Discipline of Surgery, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. venu.chalasani@sydney.edu.au.
K RasiahNorthern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia. k.rasiah@garvan.org.au.
D P SmithCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia. dsmith@nswcc.org.au.
Cancer Council NSW · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUGriffith University · AUNorthern Sydney Local Health District · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates in Australia, USA, Canada and England and quantify the gap between observed prostate cancer deaths in Australia and expected deaths, using US mortality rates.

methodsAnalysis of age-standardised prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates, using routinely available data, in four similarly developed countries and joinpoint regression to quantify the changing rates (annual percentage change: APC) and test statistical significance. Expected prostate cancer deaths, using US mortality rates, were calculated and compared with observed deaths in Australia (1994-2010).

resultsIn all four countries, incidence rates initially peaked between 1992 and 1994, but a second, higher peak occurred in Australia in 2009 (188.9/100,000), rising at a rate of 5.8 % (1998-2008). Mortality rates in the USA (APC: -2.9 %; 2004-2010), Canada (APC: -2.9 %; 2006-2011) and England (APC: -2.6 %; 2003-2008) decreased at a faster rate compared with Australia (APC: -1.7 %; 1997-2011). In 2010, mortality rates were highest in England and Australia (23.8/100,000 in both countries). The mortality gap between Australia and USA grew from 1994 to 2010, with a total of 10,895 excess prostate cancer deaths in Australia compared with US rates over 17 preceding years.

conclusionsProstate cancer incidence rates are likely heavily influenced by prostate-specific antigen testing, but the fall in mortality occurred too soon to be solely a result of testing. Greater emphasis should be placed on addressing system-wide differences in the management of prostate cancer to reduce the number of men dying from this disease.

Indexed as

AgedAge DistributionAustraliaCanadaEarly Detection of CancerEnglandHumansIncidenceMaleProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUnited StatesProstate-Specific AntigenAustraliaCanadaEnglandMortalityProstatic neoplasmsUSA

Identifiers

PMID25698456
PMCPMC4617845
OpenAlexW2087057773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.