Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25698298›Full record

Trial reportEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2016

Evaluation of a positive psychotherapy group intervention for people with psychosis: pilot randomised controlled trial.

Beate Schrank, Tamsin Brownell, Zivile Jakaite, Charley Larkin, Francesca Pesola, Simon Riches, Andre Tylee, Mike Slade

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04740944 (The Effect of Salutogenic Approach Based Interview on Sense of Coherence and Psychological Resistance of People With Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
32.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04740944 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Salutogenic Approach Based Interview on Sense of Coherence and Psychological Resistance of People With Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2018 to 2019Enrolled49ConditionsSalutogenesis, Mental Health Disorder, Schizophrenia, Sense of CoherenceArmsSalutogenic Approach Based Interview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Loneliness in psychosis: a systematic review.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Management of a High-Performing Mental Health Recovery Research Group.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. A pilot digital intervention targeting loneliness in young people with psychosis.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Is loneliness a feasible treatment target in psychosis?Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Beate SchrankDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy,Medical University of Vienna,Vienna,Austria.
Tamsin BrownellInstiture of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,London,United Kingdom.
Zivile JakaiteInstiture of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,London,United Kingdom.
Charley LarkinInstiture of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,London,United Kingdom.
Francesca PesolaInstiture of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,London,United Kingdom.
Simon RichesInstiture of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,London,United Kingdom.
Andre TyleeInstiture of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,London,United Kingdom.
Mike SladeInstiture of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,London,United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThird-wave psychological interventions have gained relevance in mental health service provision but their application to people with psychosis is in its infancy and interventions targeting wellbeing in psychosis are scarce. This study tested the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of positive psychotherapy adapted for people with psychosis (WELLFOCUS PPT) to improve wellbeing.

methodsWELLFOCUS PPT was tested as an 11-week group intervention in a convenience sample of people with psychosis in a single centre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN04199273) involving 94 people with psychosis. Patients were individually randomised in blocks to receive either WELLFOCUS PPT in addition to treatment as usual (TAU), or TAU only. Assessments took place before randomisation and after the therapy. The primary outcome was wellbeing (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale, WEMWBS). Secondary outcomes included symptoms (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale), depression (Short Depression-Happiness Scale), self-esteem, empowerment, hope, sense of coherence, savouring beliefs and functioning, as well as two alternative measures of wellbeing (the Positive Psychotherapy Inventory and Quality of Life). Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. This involved calculating crude changes and paired-sample t-tests for all variables, as well as ANCOVA and Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) Analysis to estimate the main effect of group on all outcomes.

resultsThe intervention and trial procedures proved feasible and well accepted. Crude changes between baseline and follow-up showed a significant improvement in the intervention group for wellbeing according to all three concepts assessed (i.e., WEMWBS, Positive Psychotherapy Inventory and Quality of Life), as well as for symptoms, depression, hope, self-esteem and sense of coherence. No significant changes were observed in the control group. ANCOVA showed no main effect on wellbeing according to the primary outcome scale (WEMWBS) but significant effects on symptoms (p = 0.006, ES = 0.42), depression (p = 0.03, ES = 0.38) and wellbeing according to the Positive Psychotherapy Inventory (p = 0.02, ES = 0.30). Secondary analysis adapting for therapy group further improved the results for symptom reduction (p = 0.004, ES = 0.43) and depression (p = 0.03, ES = 0.41) but did not lead to any more outcomes falling below the p = 0.05 significance level. CACE analysis showed a non-significant positive association between the intervention and WEMWBS scores at follow-up (b = 0.21, z = 0.9, p = 0.4).

conclusionsThis study provides initial evidence on the feasibility of WELLFOCUS PPT in people with psychosis, positively affecting symptoms and depression. However, more work is needed to optimise its effectiveness. Future research might evaluate positive psychotherapy as a treatment for comorbid depression in psychosis, and consider alternative measurements of wellbeing.

Indexed as

PsychotherapyPsychotherapy, GroupDepressionHumansPilot ProjectsPsychotic DisordersQuality of LifePositive psychologypsychosispsychotherapyrandomised controlled trialschizophreniawellbeing

Identifiers

PMID25698298
PMCPMC6998731
OpenAlexW2070125746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.