Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25698233›Full record

ArticlePeptides2015

A structure-function study of PACAP using conformationally restricted analogs: Identification of PAC1 receptor-selective PACAP agonists.

Irene Ramos-Álvarez, Samuel A Mantey, Taichi Nakamura, Bernardo Nuche-Berenguer, Paola Moreno, Terry W Moody, Jerome L Maderdrut, David H Coy, Robert T Jensen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Peptides, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Future targets for migraine treatment beyond CGRP.The journal of headache and pain · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Peptide receptors as cancer drug targets.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Irene Ramos-ÁlvarezDigestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, United States.
Samuel A ManteyDigestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, United States.
Taichi NakamuraDigestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, United States.
Bernardo Nuche-BerenguerDigestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, United States.
Paola MorenoDigestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, United States.
Terry W MoodyCenter for Cancer Research, Office of the Director, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, United States.
Jerome L MaderdrutPeptide Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112-2699, United States.
David H CoyPeptide Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112-2699, United States.
Robert T JensenDigestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, United States. Electronic address: robertj@bdg10.niddk.nih.gov.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · USTulane University · USCenter for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI JUDD E SHELLITO · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Cellular Basis Of Action Of Gastrointestinal Peptides/Growth factorsZIADK053101 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JENSEN, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$12.9M
Characterization And Pharmacology Of Receptors For Gastrointestinal PeptidesZIADK053100 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JENSEN, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$12.7M
Cellular Basis Of Action Of Gastrointestinal Peptides/Growth factorsZ01DK053101 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JENSEN, ROBERT · 1990 to 2008
$726k
IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF RECEPTORS FOR GI PEPTIDESZ01DK053100 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JENSEN, ROBERT · 1990 to 2008
$724k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK053100Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK053101NIGMS NIH HHS 1 U54 GM104940NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) has widespread physiological/pathophysiological actions and there is increased interest for its use therapeutically, especially in the CNS (neuroprotection). Unfortunately, no selective PACAP-analogs exist for PACAP-preferring PAC1-receptors, primarily because of its high sequence identity to VIP and particularly, because of the inability of structure-function studies to separate the pharmacophore of PAC1-R from VPAC1-R, which has high affinity for PACAP and VIP. The present study attempted to develop PAC1-R-selective agonists primarily by making conformationally restricted PACAP-analogs in positions important for receptor-selectivity/affinity. Forty-six PACAP-related-analogs were synthesized with substitutions in positions 1-4, 14-17, 20-22, 28, 34, 38 and receptor-selectivity determined in PAC1-R,VPAC1-R,VPAC2-R-transfected or native cells from binding or cAMP-generation experiments. Fifteen PACAP-analogs had 6-78-fold higher affinities for PAC1-R than VPAC1-R and 13 were agonists. Although binding-affinities correlated significantly with agonist potency, the degree of receptor-spareness varied markedly for the different PACAP-analogs, resulting in selective potencies for activating the PAC1 receptor over the VPAC1 receptor from 0- to 103-fold. In addition, a number of PACAP-analogs were identified that had high selectivity for PAC1-R over VPAC2-R as well as PACAP-analogs that could prove more useful therapeutically because of substitutions known to extend their half-lives (substitutions at potential sites of proteolysis and attachment of long-chain fatty acids). This study provides for the first time a separation of the pharmacophores for PAC1-R and VPAC1-R, resulting in PACAP-related analogs that are PAC1-R-preferring. Some of these analogs, or their modifications, could prove useful as therapeutic agents for various diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain InjuriesCell Line, TumorHumansMiceNIH 3T3 CellsPituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating PolypeptideReceptors, Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide, Type IReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Type IIReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide, Type IStrokeVasoactive Intestinal PeptidePituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating PolypeptideReceptors, Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide, Type IReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Type IIReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide, Type IVasoactive Intestinal PeptideNeuroprotectionPACAPStrokeStructure–function studyTraumatic brain injuryVasoactive intestinal peptide

Identifiers

PMID25698233
PMCPMC4420714
OpenAlexW2064111025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.