Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25697717›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2015

Subcutaneous Injection Depth Does Not Affect the Pharmacokinetics or Glucodynamics of Insulin Lispro in Normal Weight or Healthy Obese Subjects.

Amparo de la Peña, Kwee P Yeo, Helle Linnebjerg, Edward Catton, Shobha Reddy, Patricia Brown-Augsburger, Linda Morrow, Debra A Ignaut

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Indian Injection Technique Study: Population Characteristics and Injection Practices.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amparo de la PeñaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA de_la_pena_amparo@lilly.com.
Kwee P YeoLilly-NUS Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, Singapore.
Helle LinnebjergEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Edward CattonEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Shobha ReddyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Patricia Brown-AugsburgerEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Linda MorrowProfil Institute for Clinical Research, Chula Vista, CA, USA.
Debra A IgnautEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USClinical Nutrition Research Centre · SGPrecision Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn 8-mm needle length is commonly used for insulin injections; however, recent recommendations suggest shorter needles may help patients avoid intramuscular injections and reduce pain, while maintaining adequate glucose control. The goal of these analyses was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and glucodynamics (GD) of insulin lispro after a 5-mm or an 8-mm injection depth administration in 2 populations: normal weight (study 1) or obese (study 2).

methodsIn both open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover euglycemic clamp studies, subjects received single 0.25 U/kg insulin lispro doses on 2 occasions (at 5-mm and 8-mm injection depths); samples for PK and GD analyses were collected up to 6 hours postdose. Noncompartmental PK parameters AUC0-tlast, AUC0-∞, Cmax and GD parameters Gtot, Rmax, tRmax were log-transformed prior to analysis using a mixed effects model.

resultsThere were no apparent differences between PK profiles at the 5-mm or 8-mm injection depth in either study, demonstrated by the ratios of geometric means of AUC0-tlast, AUC0-∞, and Cmax being close to 1, with 90% confidence intervals (CI) within (0.80, 1.25). There were no apparent differences between GD profiles at either injection depth with the ratios of Gtot and Rmax near unity and 90% CIs that included 1. In both studies, the tRmax values were similar between injection depths, with a small median of pairwise differences and a 90% CI that included zero.

conclusionsInjection depths in the 5-8 mm range did not affect the PK or GD of insulin lispro in normal weight or obese subjects.

Indexed as

Injections, SubcutaneousAdultArea Under CurveBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexBody WeightCross-Over StudiesFemaleGlucose Clamp TechniqueHealthy VolunteersHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin LisproMaleMiddle AgedObesityBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin Lisproglucodynamicsinjection depthinsulin lispropharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID25697717
PMCPMC4525656
OpenAlexW2145777104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.