Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25697637›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2015

Flexible positions, managed hopes: the promissory bioeconomy of a whole genome sequencing cancer study.

Rachel Haase, Marsha Michie, Debra Skinner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03548779 (North Carolina Genomic Evaluation by Next-generation Exome Sequencing, 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03548779 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

North Carolina Genomic Evaluation by Next-generation Exome Sequencing, 2

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2018 to 2024Enrolled548ConditionsEpilepsy, Seizure, Neuromuscular Diseases, Brain MalformationArmsPre-visit prep, usual care + exome seq
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Psychological adaptation to diagnostic genomic sequencing results: The role of hope fulfillment.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. "Possibly positive or certainly uncertain?": participants' responses to uncertain diagnostic results from exome sequencing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. With great (participant) rights comes great (researcher) responsibility.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel HaaseDepartment of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Center for Genomics and Society, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Marsha MichieInstitute for Health & Aging, University of California San Francisco, USA; Center for Genomics and Society, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Debra SkinnerDepartment of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Center for Genomics and Society, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: debra.skinner@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

North Carolina Clinical Genomic Evaluation by Next-gen Exome Sequencing 2U01HG006487 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BERG, JONATHAN S, POWELL, BRADFORD C. · 2012 to 2021
$22.7M
Center for Genomics and SocietyP50HG004488 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSON, GAIL E · 2007 to 2017
$12.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS 2P50HG004488NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG004488NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006487NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG006487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic research has rapidly expanded its scope and ambition over the past decade, promoted by both public and private sectors as having the potential to revolutionize clinical medicine. This promissory bioeconomy of genomic research and technology is generated by, and in turn generates, the hopes and expectations shared by investors, researchers and clinicians, patients, and the general public alike. Examinations of such bioeconomies have often focused on the public discourse, media representations, and capital investments that fuel these "regimes of hope," but also crucial are the more intimate contexts of small-scale medical research, and the private hopes, dreams, and disappointments of those involved. Here we examine one local site of production in a university-based clinical research project that sought to identify novel cancer predisposition genes through whole genome sequencing in individuals at high risk for cancer. In-depth interviews with 24 adults who donated samples to the study revealed an ability to shift flexibly between positioning themselves as research participants on the one hand, and as patients or as family members of patients, on the other. Similarly, interviews with members of the research team highlighted the dual nature of their positions as researchers and as clinicians. For both parties, this dual positioning shaped their investment in the project and valuing of its possible outcomes. In their narratives, all parties shifted between these different relational positions as they managed hopes and expectations for the research project. We suggest that this flexibility facilitated study implementation and participation in the face of potential and probable disappointment on one or more fronts, and acted as a key element in the resilience of this local promissory bioeconomy. We conclude that these multiple dimensions of relationality and positionality are inherent and essential in the creation of any complex economy, "bio" or otherwise.

Indexed as

UniversitiesAdultAnimalsFemaleGenomicsHopeHumansInterviews as TopicKnowledgeMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProtein Array AnalysisResearch PersonnelTissue DonorsBioeconomiesBiovalueCancerPositionalityResearch-clinical care boundaryTranslational genomicsUnited StatesWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID25697637
PMCPMC4363274
OpenAlexW2000366104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.