Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25697272›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2015

Effects of employment of distinct strategies to capture antibody on antibody delivery into cultured cells.

Kana Kuwahara, Kazuki Harada, Ryohei Yamagoshi, Takenori Yamamoto, Yasuo Shinohara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kana KuwaharaInstitute for Genome Research, University of Tokushima, Kuramoto-cho-3, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Kazuki Harada
Ryohei Yamagoshi
Takenori Yamamoto
Yasuo Shinohara
Tokushima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characteristics of antibody delivery into cultured HeLa cells were examined using two delivery systems. Both systems used a cell-penetrating peptide as a tool for intrusion of an antibody into the cells, but either a "protein A derivative" or "hydrophobic motif" was employed to capture the antibody. When we examined the uptake of the Alexa Fluor-labeled antibody by the use of these two systems, both systems were found to effectively deliver the antibody into the cultured cells. However, when we compared the amount of antibody delivered by these systems with the amount of transferrin uptake, the former was 10 times smaller than the latter. The lower efficiency of antibody delivery than transferrin uptake seemed to be attributable to the involvement of the antibody delivery reagent, which failed to catch the antibody molecule. This interpretation was validated by an experiment using a larger amount of antibody, and the amount of antibody delivered by the "protein A derivative" system under this condition was determined to be 13 ng proteins/10(5) cells. The antibody delivery achieved by the "protein A derivative" or "hydrophobic motif" showed two differences, i.e., a difference in intracellular distribution of the delivered antibody molecules and a difference in the fluorescence spectrum observed with cellular lysates. Possible reasons for these differences between the two delivery systems are discussed.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAntibodiesCell-Penetrating PeptidesCytoplasmHeLa CellsHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsStaphylococcal Protein ATransferrinAntibodiesCell-Penetrating PeptidesStaphylococcal Protein ATransferrin

Identifiers

PMID25697272
OpenAlexW2143482740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.