ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2004
Pneumothorax resulting from subclavian puncture: a complication of permanent pacemaker lead implantation.
Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case report: A rare complication after the implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device: Contralateral pneumothorax with pneumopericardium and pneumomediastinum.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Miniaturized and Micro Devices.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Triple lead cephalic versus subclavian vein approach in cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Complications of electrotherapy - the dark side of treatment with cardiac implantable electronic devices.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2018Review
- Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices using three leads by cephalic vein dissection approach.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017Article
- Lead displacement due to tension pneumothorax following permanent pacemaker implantation.Journal of cardiology cases · 2017Article
- Pacemaker insertion.Annals of translational medicine · 2015Article
- Access times for supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches of subclavian vein catheterization in pacemaker insertion.International journal of health sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pneumothorax is a mild complication during pacemaker lead implantation using the subclavian puncture technique. We report on five-year experience in 433 pacemaker lead implantation procedures in 379 patients. The cephalic vein route was solely used in twelve patients. Three procedures were performed over time in four patients and one patient needed four repetitive punctures for pacemaker lead implantation and replacement. Thus 421 punctures were carried out in 367 patients. Eleven case of pneumothorax were observed: in eight patients (1.9%) a partial pneumothorax occurred and in three patients (0.7%) the pneumothorax was nearly complete. In the latter patients a chest tube was inserted and hospital admission was prolonged for 3, 6 and 6 days, respectively. Old age with a corresponding abnormality in the form of chest deformation were predominantly found in the patients with this type of complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25696306PMC2497053What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.