Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25695927›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2015

Cyclin-dependent kinase pathway aberrations in diverse malignancies: clinical and molecular characteristics.

Shumei Kato, Maria Schwaederle, Gregory A Daniels, David Piccioni, Santosh Kesari, Lyudmila Bazhenova, Kelly Shimabukuro, Barbara A Parker, Paul Fanta, Razelle Kurzrock

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unique characteristics ofSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Concomitant MEK and Cyclin Gene Alterations: Implications for Response to Targeted Therapeutics.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cyclin E Overexpression Sensitizes Triple-Negative Breast Cancer to Wee1 Kinase Inhibition.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shumei Katoa Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology ; Department of Medicine; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center ; La Jolla , CA USA.
Maria Schwaederle
Gregory A Daniels
David Piccioni
Santosh Kesari
Lyudmila Bazhenova
Kelly Shimabukuro
Barbara A Parker
Paul Fanta
Razelle Kurzrock
La Jolla Alcohol Research · USMoores Cancer CenterUC San Diego Health System · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrations in the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) pathways that regulate the cell cycle restriction point contribute to genomic instability and tumor proliferation, and can be targeted by recently developed CDK inhibitors. We therefore investigated the clinical correlates of CDK4/6 and CDKN2A/B abnormalities in diverse malignancies. Patients with various cancers who underwent molecular profiling by targeted next generation sequencing (Foundation Medicine; 182 or 236 cancer-related genes) were reviewed. Of 347 patients analyzed, 79 (22.8%) had aberrant CDK 4/6 or CDKN2A/B. Only TP53 mutations occurred more frequently than those in CDK elements. Aberrations were most frequent in glioblastomas (21/26 patients; 81%) and least frequent in colorectal cancers (0/26 patients). Aberrant CDK elements were independently associated with EGFR and ARID1A gene abnormalities (P < 0.0001 and p = 0.01; multivariate analysis). CDK aberrations were associated with poor overall survival (univariate analysis; HR[95% CI] = 2.09 [1.35-4.70]; p = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, PTEN and TP53 aberrations were independently associated with poorer survival (HR = 4.83 and 1.92; P < 0.0001 and p = 0.01); CDK aberrations showed a trend toward worse survival (HR = 1.67; p = 0.09). There was also a trend toward worse progression-free survival (PFS) with platinum-containing regimens in patients with abnormal CDK elements (3.5 versus 5.0 months, p = 0.13). In conclusion, aberrations in the CDK pathway were some of the most common in cancer and independently associated with EGFR and ARID1A alterations. Patients with abnormal CDK pathway genes showed a trend toward poorer survival, as well as worse PFS on platinum-containing regimens. Further investigation of the prognostic and predictive impact of CDK alterations across cancers is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic AgentsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Disease-Free SurvivalDNA-Binding ProteinsErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsARID1A protein, humanCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16DNA-Binding ProteinsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsNuclear ProteinsPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53cancerCDK4/6CDKN2A/Bcyclin-Dependent Kinasenext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID25695927
PMCPMC4614867
OpenAlexW1952695242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.