Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25695748›Full record

ArticlemAbs2015

Balancing charge in the complementarity-determining regions of humanized mAbs without affecting pI reduces non-specific binding and improves the pharmacokinetics.

Amita Datta-Mannan, Arunkumar Thangaraju, Donmienne Leung, Ying Tang, Derrick R Witcher, Jirong Lu, Victor J Wroblewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Antibody Drug Clearance: An Underexplored Marker of Outcomes with Checkpoint Inhibitors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Defining and Studying B Cell Receptor and TCR Interactions.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amita Datta-Mannana Department of Drug Disposition Development/Commercialization; Lilly Research Laboratories; Eli Lilly and Company Corporate Center , Indianapolis , IN USA.
Arunkumar Thangaraju
Donmienne Leung
Ying Tang
Derrick R Witcher
Jirong Lu
Victor J Wroblewski
Eli Lilly (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lowering the isoelectric point (pI) through engineering the variable region or framework of an IgG can improve its exposure and half-life via a reduction in clearance mediated through non-specific interactions. As such, net charge is a potentially important property to consider in developing therapeutic IgG molecules having favorable pharmaceutical characteristics. Frequently, it may not be possible to shift the pI of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) dramatically without the introduction of other liabilities such as increased off-target interactions or reduced on-target binding properties. In this report, we explored the influence of more subtle modifications of molecular charge on the in vivo properties of an IgG1 and IgG4 monoclonal antibody. Molecular surface modeling was used to direct residue substitutions in the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) to disrupt positive charge patch regions, resulting in a reduction in net positive charge without affecting the overall pI of the mAbs. The effect of balancing the net positive charge on non-specific binding was more significant for the IgG4 versus the IgG1 molecule that we examined. This differential effect was connected to the degree of influence on cellular degradation in vitro and in vivo clearance, distribution and metabolism in mice. In the more extreme case of the IgG4, balancing the charge yielded an ∼7-fold improvement in peripheral exposure, as well as significantly reduced tissue catabolism and subsequent excretion of proteolyzed products in urine. Balancing charge on the IgG1 molecule had a more subtle influence on non-specific binding and yielded only a modest alteration in clearance, distribution and elimination. These results suggest that balancing CDR charge without affecting the pI can lead to improved mAb pharmacokinetics, the magnitude of which is likely dependent on the relative influence of charge imbalance and other factors affecting the molecule's disposition.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplementarity Determining RegionsImmunoglobulin GModels, MolecularAnimalsAntibody SpecificityHEK293 CellsHumansIsoelectric PointMiceAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplementarity Determining RegionsImmunoglobulin G125I, Iodine 125antibody pharmacokineticsAUC, area under the curveCDR, complementarity-determining regionCDR modificationcharge interactions of IgGsELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assayFcRn, neonatal Fc receptorFcRn recyclingHBSS, Hank's balanced salt saline solutionHEK293 cellsIgGs, immunoglobulinsin vitro degradationIV, intravenousKDa, kilodaltonKD, equilibrium dissociation constantnon-specific bindingpI, isoelectric pointPK, pharmacokineticsradiolabel antibody biodistributionSD, standard deviationSPR, surface plasmon resonanceTCA, trichloroacetic acidTMDD, target-mediated drug disposition

Identifiers

PMID25695748
PMCPMC4622971
OpenAlexW1855086894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.