Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25695693›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

Hotspot mutation panel testing reveals clonal evolution in a study of 265 paired primary and metastatic tumors.

Rashmi S Goswami, Keyur P Patel, Rajesh R Singh, Funda Meric-Bernstam, E Scott Kopetz, Vivek Subbiah, Ricardo H Alvarez, Michael A Davies, Kausar J Jabbar, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Whole-Exome Sequencing of Matched Primary and Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Cancer.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rashmi S GoswamiDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Keyur P PatelDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rajesh R SinghDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Funda Meric-BernstamDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
E Scott KopetzDepartment of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Vivek SubbiahDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ricardo H AlvarezDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Michael A DaviesDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kausar J JabbarDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sinchita Roy-ChowdhuriDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Alexander J LazarDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
L Jeffrey MedeirosDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Russell R BroaddusDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rajyalakshmi LuthraDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mark J RoutbortDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. mark.routbort@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)KL2TR000370 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
CIHRNCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000370NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe used a clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) hotspot mutation panel to investigate clonal evolution in paired primary and metastatic tumors. EXPERIMENTAL

designA total of 265 primary and metastatic tumor pairs were sequenced using a 46-gene cancer mutation panel capable of detecting one or more single-nucleotide variants as well as small insertions/deletions. Mutations were tabulated together with tumor type and percentage, mutational variant frequency, time interval between onset of primary tumor and metastasis, and neoadjuvant therapy status.

resultsOf note, 227 of 265 (85.7%) tumor metastasis pairs showed identical mutation calls. Of the tumor pairs with identical mutation calls, 160 (60.4%) possessed defining somatic mutation signatures and 67 (25.3%) did not exhibit any somatic mutations. There were 38 (14.3%) cases that showed at least one novel mutation call between the primary and metastasis. Metastases were almost two times more likely to show novel mutations (n = 20, 7.5%) than primary tumors (n = 12, 4.5%). TP53 was the most common additionally mutated gene in metastatic lesions, followed by PIK3CA and SMAD4. PIK3CA mutations were more often associated with metastasis in colon carcinoma samples.

conclusionsClinical NGS hotspot panels can be useful in analyzing clonal evolution within tumors as well as in determining subclonal mutations that can expand in future metastases. PIK3CA, SMAD4, and TP53 are most often involved in clonal divergence, providing potential targets that may help guide the clinical management of tumor progression or metastases.

Indexed as

Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesClonal EvolutionDNA Mutational AnalysisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSmad4 ProteinTumor Suppressor Protein p53Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanSmad4 ProteinSMAD4 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID25695693
PMCPMC5015593
OpenAlexW2116561474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.