Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25695473›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric physical therapy (2001)

A Pilot Study of Determinants of Ongoing Participation in EnhanceFitness: A Community-Based Group Exercise Program for Older Adults.

David B Gillette, Miruna Petrescu-Prahova, Jerald R Herting, Basia Belza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric physical therapy (2001). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Provider-Patient Communication and Involvement in Physical Activity Programs Among Patients Receiving Physical Therapy Services: A Qualitative Study.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David B Gillette1St. Therese Rehabilitation, New Hope, Minnesota. 2Department of Health Services and Health Promotion Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle. 3Psychosocial & Community Health, University of Washington, Seattle. 4School of Public Health and Health Promotion Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle.
Miruna Petrescu-Prahova
Jerald R Herting
Basia Belza

Funding

HEALTH PROMOTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001911 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI AU, DAVID H, HARRIS, JEFFREY RANDALL · 2009 to 2013
$14.3M
Institute for Translational Health Science (TL1)TL1RR025016 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$2.7M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001911NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48-DP001911NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR025016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePhysical activity has many benefits for older adults, but adherence is often low. The purposes of this study were to (1) identify motivators and barriers for participation in EnhanceFitness (EF), a group-based exercise program; and (2) quantitatively examine the association between motivators, barriers and individual characteristics, and ongoing participation in the program.

methodsThis was a prospective, cross-sectional study. We mailed a pilot, investigator-developed survey to assess motivators and barriers to exercising to 340 adults who started a new EF class, regardless of their attendance rate. We precoded surveys on the basis of class attendance, with former participants defined as having no attendance a month or more before a 4-month fitness check.

resultsOf the 241 respondents (71% response rate), 61 (25%) were precoded as former participants and 180 (75%) as current participants. The mean age of respondents was 71 years and they were predominately female (89%). More than half of respondents were whites (58%), and almost half were married (46%). Former participants reported lower total motivation scores than current participants (P < .01) and had a significantly higher mean total barrier score (P < .001). The effects of 5 barriers ("Class was too hard," "Class was too easy," "I don't like to exercise," "Personal illness," and "Exercise caused pain") and 2 motivators ("I want to exercise" and "I plan exercise as part of my day") were significantly different between current and former participants. Discrete event history models show that dropout was related positively to ethnicity (whites were more likely to drop out) and health-related barriers. DISCUSSION: In newly formed EF classes, participants who drop out report more program, psychosocial, and health barriers, and fewer program and psychosocial motivators. Total barrier score and health barriers significantly predict a participant's dropping out, and white ethnicity is associated with a higher likelihood of dropping out.

conclusionsEmploying strategies that address health barriers to participation could improve attendance rates for group-based exercise programs.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth PromotionHumansIndependent LivingMaleMinnesotaPatient ParticipationPhysical Fitness

Identifiers

PMID25695473
PMCPMC4540700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.