Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25694208›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2015

Children have a reduced maximal voluntary activation level of the adductor pollicis muscle compared to adults.

V Martin, V Kluka, S Garcia Vicencio, F Maso, S Ratel

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

V MartinUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, Laboratoire des Adaptations Métaboliques à l'Exercice en Conditions Physiologiques et Pathologiques (AME2P, EA 3533), BP 10448, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France, vincent.martin@univ-bpclermont.fr.
V Kluka
S Garcia Vicencio
F Maso
S Ratel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe role of nervous factors in the muscle strength difference between children and adults is debated, and the level of physical activity may confound this comparison. The purpose of this study was thus to compare, between children and adults, the maximal voluntary activation level (MVA) of the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle, which is weakly influenced by the level of physical activity.

methodsThirteen boys (11.6 ± 0.1 years) and eight men (25.6 ± 1.5 years) were involved in this study. Neuromuscular function assessment included the evaluation of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force and of the MVA from peripheral magnetic stimulations of the ulnar nerve. The cross-sectional area of the AP muscle was determined with ultrasonography and used to calculate the specific force. A theoretical value of specific force, extrapolated for a full MVA, was finally computed (specific force@100 % MVA).

resultsMVC force (66.8 ± 6.2 vs. 111.0 ± 4.5 N, respectively; P < 0.001) and MVA (85.0 ± 2.7 vs. 94.8 ± 1.4 %, respectively; P < 0.05) were significantly lower in children compared to adults. The specific force was lower in children compared to adults (46.8 ± 3.6 vs. 56.9 ± 2.5 N/cm(2), respectively; P < 0.05), but the specific force@100 % MVA did not differ between groups.

conclusionThe results suggest that on an untrained muscle such as the AP muscle, the reduced ability of children to voluntarily activate their muscle could partly account for the difference of muscle strength between children and adults.

Indexed as

AdultChildHumansMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthThumbUlnar NerveYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.