Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25694071›Full record

ArticleMini reviews in medicinal chemistry2015

Multiscale modelling of relationships between protein classes and drug behavior across all diseases using the CANDO platform.

Geetika Sethi, Gaurav Chopra, Ram Samudrala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antiviral Approaches against Influenza Virus.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A Deep-Learning Proteomic-Scale Approach for Drug Design.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Geetika Sethi
Gaurav Chopra
Ram SamudralaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York (SUNY), 923 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA. ram@compbio.org.

Funding

NOVEL PARADIGMS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY: COMPUTATIONAL MULTITARGET SCREENINGDP1LM011509 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SAMUDRALA, RAM · 2012 to 2014
$2.4M
NOVEL PARADIGMS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY: COMPUTATIONAL MULTITARGET SCREENINGDP1OD006779 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SAMUDRALA, RAM · 2010 to 2011
$1.7M
NIH HHS 1DP1OD006779-01NIH HHS DP1 OD006779NLM NIH HHS DP1 LM011509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have examined the effect of eight different protein classes (channels, GPCRs, kinases, ligases, nuclear receptors, proteases, phosphatases, transporters) on the benchmarking performance of the CANDO drug discovery and repurposing platform (http://protinfo.org/cando). The first version of the CANDO platform utilizes a matrix of predicted interactions between 48278 proteins and 3733 human ingestible compounds (including FDA approved drugs and supplements) that map to 2030 indications/diseases using a hierarchical chem and bio-informatic fragment based docking with dynamics protocol (> one billion predicted interactions considered). The platform uses similarity of compound-proteome interaction signatures as indicative of similar functional behavior and benchmarking accuracy is calculated across 1439 indications/diseases with more than one approved drug. The CANDO platform yields a significant correlation (0.99, p-value < 0.0001) between the number of proteins considered and benchmarking accuracy obtained indicating the importance of multitargeting for drug discovery. Average benchmarking accuracies range from 6.2 % to 7.6 % for the eight classes when the top 10 ranked compounds are considered, in contrast to a range of 5.5 % to 11.7 % obtained for the comparison/control sets consisting of 10, 100, 1000, and 10000 single best performing proteins. These results are generally two orders of magnitude better than the average accuracy of 0.2% obtained when randomly generated (fully scrambled) matrices are used. Different indications perform well when different classes are used but the best accuracies (up to 11.7% for the top 10 ranked compounds) are achieved when a combination of classes are used containing the broadest distribution of protein folds. Our results illustrate the utility of the CANDO approach and the consideration of different protein classes for devising indication specific protocols for drug repurposing as well as drug discovery.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular Targeted TherapyPolypharmacologyProteinsProteomicsSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID25694071
PMCPMC5903852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.