ArticleDer Internist2015
[Interventional strategies in hypertension management].
Article in Der Internist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Invasive treatment of hypertension : Update 2016].Der Internist · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of invasive treatment approaches have become established in the management of severe treatment-resistant hypertension in recent years, including renal denervation and baroreceptor activation therapy. Both methods achieve their antihypertensive effect by influencing the autonomic nervous system. Renal denervation in particular has stimulated considerable interest, since it is simple to perform and initial studies have yielded highly promising results. However, enthusiasm has waned significantly since the initial euphoria. This is due to the fact that the first randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study showed the method to have no significant effect on blood pressure. This experience illustrates the importance of conducting double-blind studies. On the other hand, these results should not lead to renal denervation being shelved. On the contrary, it is worth attempting to improve the treatment and develop criteria to identify which patients it is likely to benefit. Although experience with baroreceptor activation therapy is significantly more limited, similar conclusions can be drawn on it, despite the fact that-in contrast to renal denervation-it achieved a blood pressure reduction of around 10 mmHg in a double-blind study. A potential novel treatment approach lies in creating an arteriovenous shunt between the iliac artery and vein, which has a particularly marked effect on diastolic blood pressure by reducing peripheral resistance. Therapy using brain stimulation of areas in the brainstem region responsible for blood pressure regulation is still at an experimental stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.