Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25693894›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue research2015

Tissue underlying the intestinal epithelium elicits proliferation of intestinal stem cells following cytotoxic damage.

Kristen M Seiler, Erica L Schenhals, Richard J von Furstenberg, Bhavya K Allena, Brian J Smith, Denny Scaria, Michele N Bresler, Christopher M Dekaney, Susan J Henning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cellular Interactions in the Intestinal Stem Cell Niche.Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristen M SeilerDepartment of Medicine and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4341 Medical Biomolecular Research Building (MBRB), CB# 7032, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7032, USA.
Erica L Schenhals
Richard J von Furstenberg
Bhavya K Allena
Brian J Smith
Denny Scaria
Michele N Bresler
Christopher M Dekaney
Susan J Henning
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Temitope O. Keku · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH TRAININGT32DK007737 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHEHZAD Z. SHEIKH · 1996 to 2026
$7.8M
Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating CenterU01DK085532 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2009 to 2018
$6.5M
Limited Competition for the Continuation of the Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating CenterU24DK085532 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Collaborative Approaches to the Study of Intestinal Epithelial Stem CellsU01DK085547 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENNING, SUSAN J. · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007737NIDDK NIH HHS T32-DK007737NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085532NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085547NIDDK NIH HHS U01-DK085547NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK085532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goals of this study were to document the proliferative response of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) during regeneration after damage from doxorubicin (DXR), and to characterize the signals responsible for ISC activation. To this end, jejuni from DXR-treated mice were harvested for histology, assessment of ISC numbers and proliferation by flow cytometry, crypt culture, and RNA analyses. Histology showed that crypt depth and width were increased 4 days after DXR. At this time point, flow cytometry on tissue collected 1 h after EdU administration revealed increased numbers of CD24(lo)UEA(-) ISCs and increased percentage of ISCs cycling. In culture, crypts harvested from DXR-treated mice were equally proliferative as those of control mice. Addition of subepithelial intestinal tissue (SET) collected 4 days after DXR elicited increased budding (1.4 ± 0.3 vs. 5.1 ± 1.0 buds per enteroid). Microarray analysis of SET collected 4 days after DXR revealed 1030 differentially expressed transcripts. Cross-comparison of Gene Ontology terms considered relevant to ISC activation pointed to 10 candidate genes. Of these, the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family member amphiregulin and the BMP antagonist chordin-like 2 were chosen for further study. In crypt culture, amphiregulin alone did not elicit significant budding, but amphiregulin in combination with BMP antagonism showed marked synergism (yielding 6.3 ± 0.5 buds per enteroid). These data suggest a critical role for underlying tissue in regulating ISC behavior after damage, and point to synergism between amphiregulin and chordin-like 2 as factors which may account for activation of ISCs in the regenerative phase.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationRegenerationAmphiregulinAnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCarrier ProteinsCells, CulturedDoxorubicinExtracellular Matrix ProteinsIntestinesMaleMice, Inbred C57BLStem CellsAmphiregulinAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCarrier ProteinsChrdl2 protein, mouseDoxorubicinExtracellular Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25693894
PMCPMC4530061
OpenAlexW1991683105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.