ReviewHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2015
Outcomes of 83 fetuses exposed to angiotensin receptor blockers during the second or third trimesters: a literature review.
Review in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid Normalization of Amniotic Fluid Index Following Discontinuation of Olmesartan: A Case Report.AJP reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Brazilian Cardiology Society Statement for Management of Pregnancy and Family Planning in Women with Heart Disease - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020Article
- Roles of angiotensin II type 2 receptor in mice with fetal growth restriction.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2018Article
- Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This literature review was conducted to provide better counsel to pregnant women who erroneously took angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) during the second and/or third trimesters regarding infant outcomes. Information was available on 83 fetuses in 34 literature reports, including one that we encountered recently. Fourteen pregnancies were terminated, and six were unknown regarding status of amniotic fluid volume (AFV). Fifty-eight and five fetuses did and did not show oligohydramnios, respectively, after being exposed to ARBs. Of the 58 fetuses that presented with oligohydramnios, 57 were exposed to ARBs at gestational week (GW) ⩾ 20, and 19 exhibited resolution of oligohydramnios 1-6 weeks after cessation of ARBs. The 24 mothers without oligohydramnios at delivery ceased taking ARBs earlier (GW of 26.8 ± 5.1 vs. 31.8 ± 4.0, respectively, P = 0.000) and had longer duration of gestation after cessation of ARBs (8.4 ± 5.2 vs. 0.7 ± 2.3 weeks, respectively, P = 0.000). The mothers without oligohydramnios also had better outcomes in terms of favorable infant outcomes (63% (15/24) vs. 15% (6/39), respectively, P = 0.000) and infant mortality rates (13% (3/24) vs. 56% (22/39), respectively, P = 0.001) than the 39 with oligohydramnios. Thus, a favorable outcome may be feasible if the fetuses are not indicated for prompt delivery at presentation and exhibit normal AFV or resolution of oligohydramnios after cessation of ARBs. Although the prevalence rate of oligohydramnios was high in this study, it may have been due to publication bias. A prospective study suggested a lower prevalence rate than that reported in the present study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.