Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25693729›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2015

Pancreatic cancer and FOLFIRINOX: a new era and new questions.

Robert De W Marsh, Mark S Talamonti, Matthew Harold Katz, Joseph M Herman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02648711 (Evaluation of an Alternative Schedule for CRLX101 Alone in Combination With Bevacizumab and in Combination With mFOLFOX6 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02648711 phase1terminatednot on this map

Evaluation of an Alternative Schedule for CRLX101 Alone in Combination With Bevacizumab and in Combination With mFOLFOX6 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies

TypeinterventionalSponsorNewLink Genetics CorporationRan2015 to 2018Enrolled41ConditionsSolid TumorsArmsCRLX101, Bevacizumab, mFOLFOX6
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nanoparticle-based immunotherapy of pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Combination Therapies and Drug Delivery Platforms in Combating Pancreatic Cancer.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert De W MarshDepartment of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, 60201.
Mark S TalamontiDepartment of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, 60201.
Matthew Harold KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Joseph M HermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FOLFIRINOX (FFX) was introduced to clinical practice in 2010 following publication of the PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11 study, which compared this novel regimen to gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Median overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective responses were all superior with FFX and there was improved time to definitive deterioration in quality of life. Despite initial concerns over toxicity, there has been rapid uptake of this regimen, both revolutionizing management and opening the door to innovative research. As experience with FFX has accrued, many questions have arisen including the management of toxicities, the impact of frequent modifications, the optimal number of cycles, integration with other regimens and modalities, interpretation of radiologic and serologic response, utility of molecular signatures, and potential benefit in unique clinical settings such as pre- and postsurgery. This review will closely examine these issues, not only to summarize current knowledge but also to fuel scientific debate.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinChemoradiotherapyClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDrug Administration ScheduleFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinPancreatic NeoplasmsPatient Care PlanningPostoperative CarePreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCamptothecinFluorouracilIrinotecanLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinChemotherapyFOLFIRINOXgenomicsmodificationspancreatic cancertoxicity

Identifiers

PMID25693729
PMCPMC4472208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.