Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25693650›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2015

Variation in Inpatient Consultation Among Older Adults in the United States.

Jennifer P Stevens, David Nyweide, Sha Maresh, Alan Zaslavsky, William Shrank, Michael D Howell, Bruce E Landon

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investigation of Consultations Requested by Dermatology Inpatient.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer P StevensCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
David Nyweide
Sha Maresh
Alan Zaslavsky
William Shrank
Michael D Howell
Bruce E Landon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferences among hospitals in the use of inpatient consultation may contribute to variation in outcomes and costs for hospitalized patients, but basic epidemiologic data on consultations nationally are lacking.

objectiveThe purpose of the study was to identify physician, hospital, and geographic factors that explain variation in rates of inpatient consultation.

designThis was a retrospective observational study. SETTING AND

participantsThis work included 3,118,080 admissions of Medicare patients to 4,501 U.S. hospitals in 2009 and 2010. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was number of consultations conducted during the hospitalization, summarized at the hospital level as the number of consultations per 1,000 Medicare admissions, or "consultation density." KEY

resultsConsultations occurred 2.6 times per admission on average. Among non-critical access hospitals, use of consultation varied 3.6-fold across quintiles of hospitals (933 versus 3,390 consultations per 1,000 admissions, lowest versus highest quintiles, p < 0.001). Sicker patients received greater intensity of consultation (rate ratio [RR] 1.18, 95% CI 1.17-1.18 for patients admitted to ICU; and RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.18-1.20 for patients who died). However, even after controlling for patient-level factors, hospital characteristics also predicted differences in rates of consultation. For example, hospital size (large versus small, RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.25-1.37), rural location (rural versus urban, RR 0.78, CI 95% 0.76-0.80), ownership status (public versus not-for-profit, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97), and geographic quadrant (Northeast versus West, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.21) all influenced the intensity of consultation use.

conclusionsHospitals exhibit marked variation in the number of consultations per admission in ways not fully explained by patient characteristics. Hospital "consultation density" may constitute an important focus for monitoring resource use for hospitals or health systems.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Services ResearchHospital Bed CapacityHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMaleMedicareProfessional PracticeReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25693650
PMCPMC4471009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.