ReviewThe AAPS journal2015
Emerging Insights for Translational Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Studies: Towards Prediction of Nose-to-Brain Transport in Humans.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reduction of smoking urges with intranasal insulin: a randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Molecular psychiatry · 2017Trial
- Bridging the Lab-to-Clinic Gap in Intranasal Nanomaterial-Based Chemotherapy for Glioblastoma.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- TogoPhosTAC as a delivery-ready platform for targeted protein dephosphorylation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Systematic Design and Evaluation of Nasal Drug Delivery for Central Nervous System Disease from Experimental to Clinical Application.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Multi-elemental fingerprinting of the human brain: distribution of toxic, essential, and rare earth elements across neocortical, limbic, and subcortical regions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Brain Delivery of G4 70/30 PAMAM Dendrimers via the Intranasal Route.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Overcoming Biological Barriers: A Comprehensive Review of Advanced Melatonin Delivery Systems for Therapeutic Applications.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Intranasal Drug Delivery Technology in the Treatment of Central Nervous System Diseases: Challenges, Advances, and Future Research Directions.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- The Nasal-Brain Drug Delivery Route: Mechanisms and Applications to Central Nervous System Diseases.MedComm · 2025Review
- Validation of UV-Vis spectrophotometric colorimetric methods for Rifampicin quantification in PBS & biological matrices.Bioanalysis · 2025Article
- Characterization of an olfactory system dysfunction model: a vanadium dose-effect study via nose-to-brain delivery in rats.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2025Article
- A Review on Lipid-based Nanoformulations for Targeting Brain through Non-invasive Nasal Route.Pharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2025Review
- Technological Strategies Applied to Pharmaceutical Systems for Intranasal Administration of Drugs Intended for Neurological Treatments: A Review.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Review
- Nasal Delivery to the Brain: Harnessing Nanoparticles for Effective Drug Transport.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Utility of a Novel Micro-Spraying Device for Intranasal Administration of Drug Solutions to Mice.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Novel Therapeutic Opportunities for Neurodegenerative Diseases with Mesenchymal Stem Cells: The Focus on Modulating the Blood-Brain Barrier.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Nanotechnology prospects in brain therapeutics concerning gene-targeting and nose-to-brain administration.iScience · 2023Review
- Transnasal-brain delivery of nanomedicines for neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2023Review
- Research progress in brain-targeted nasal drug delivery.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Review
- Antiparkinsonian Agents in Investigational Polymeric Micro- and Nano-Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the potential added value of intranasal drug administration, preclinical studies to date have typically used the area under the curve (AUC) in brain tissue or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compared to plasma following intranasal and intravenous administration to calculate measures of extent like drug targeting efficiencies (%DTE) and nose-to-brain transport percentages (%DTP). However, CSF does not necessarily provide direct information on the target site concentrations, while total brain concentrations are not specific to that end either as non-specific binding is not explicitly considered. Moreover, to predict nose-to-brain transport in humans, the use of descriptive analysis of preclinical data does not suffice. Therefore, nose-to-brain research should be performed translationally and focus on preclinical studies to obtain specific information on absorption from the nose, and distinguish between the different transport routes to the brain (absorption directly from the nose to the brain, absorption from the nose into the systemic circulation, and distribution between the systemic circulation and the brain), in terms of extent as well as rate. This can be accomplished by the use of unbound concentrations obtained from plasma and brain, with subsequent advanced mathematical modeling. To that end, brain extracellular fluid (ECF) is a preferred sampling site as it represents most closely the site of action for many targets. Furthermore, differences in nose characteristics between preclinical species and humans should be considered. Finally, pharmacodynamic measurements that can be obtained in both animals and humans should be included to further improve the prediction of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of intranasally administered CNS drugs in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.