Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25693108›Full record

ReviewLab animal2015

Nalbuphine, a non-controlled opioid analgesic, and its potential use in research mice.

Heather Lyons Narver

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lab animal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Nalbuphine after Intraperitoneal and Subcutaneous Administration to C57BL/6 Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nitric Oxide Stimulates Acute Pancreatitis Pain via Activating the NF-Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather Lyons NarverAnimal Health and Care Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nalbuphine is an inexpensive, non-controlled, opioid analgesic that has been in clinical use for decades. A kappa opioid receptor agonist and mu opioid receptor antagonist, nalbuphine causes fewer adverse effects than other opioid analgesics. The author reviews the characteristics of nalbuphine, analyzes studies of nalbuphine in mice and explores the potential use of nalbuphine to treat pain in research mice. In analgesiometric studies in mice, nalbuphine ameliorates both somatic and visceral pain. Nalbuphine seems to have a broad range of safe doses for subcutaneous administration in mice. Unlike non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, nalbuphine does not antagonize prostaglandins or impede labor in mice. Although additional study is needed before clinical use can be recommended, evidence presented here suggests that nalbuphine might be an effective analgesic for dystocia (or difficult birth) and other painful conditions in research mice.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsDystociaFemaleMaleMiceNalbuphinePainPregnancyReceptors, Opioid, kappaAnalgesics, OpioidNalbuphineReceptors, Opioid, kappa

Identifiers

PMID25693108
OpenAlexW2122783971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.