Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25693107›Full record

ReviewLab animal2015

Imaging technologies and basic considerations for welfare of laboratory rodents.

Jordi L Tremoleda, Jane Sosabowski

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lab animal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jordi L TremoledaCentre for Trauma Sciences-Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Jane SosabowskiCentre for Trauma Sciences-Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging technologies are regularly used in biomedical research to study processes in living animals in a noninvasive manner. But imaging procedures can affect animal physiology, and the need to anesthetize animals for imaging entails potential health risks. In addition, certain imaging modalities require the use of ionizing radiation or the administration of contrast agents or imaging biomarkers, which also have consequences for animal physiology. Finally, procedures associated with imaging, such as animal preparation (e.g., fasting, premedication) and blood sampling, can also affect physiology and animal welfare. Here, the authors review the imaging modalities commonly used for rodents in biomedical research and their associated considerations for animal welfare.

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryAnimal WelfareAnimalsBiomedical ResearchMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID25693107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.