Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25692910›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2015

Sustaining mammography screening among the medically underserved: a follow-up evaluation.

Terry C Davis, Connie L Arnold, Charles L Bennett, Michael S Wolf, Dachao Liu, Alfred Rademaker

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Multilevel Intervention Raises Latina Participation in Mammography Screening: Findings from ¡Fortaleza Latina!Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Terry C Davis1 Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center , Shreveport, Louisiana.
Connie L Arnold
Charles L Bennett
Michael S Wolf
Dachao Liu
Alfred Rademaker
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · USNorthwestern Medicine · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Health Literacy Intervention and Cancer ScreeningR01CA115869 · NCI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI DAVIS, TERRY C · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115869NCI NIH HHS R01-CA115869-05NIGMS NIH HHS 1 U54 GM104940NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur previous three-arm comparative effectiveness intervention in community clinic patients who were not up-to-date with screening resulted in mammography rates over 50% in all arms.

objectiveOur aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the three interventions on improving biennial screening rates among eligible patients.

methodsA three-arm quasi-experimental evaluation was conducted in eight community clinics from 2008 to 2011. Screening efforts included (1) enhanced care: Participants received an in-person recommendation from a research assistant (RA) in year 1, and clinics followed usual clinic protocol for scheduling screening mammograms; (2) education intervention: Participants received education and in-person recommendation from an RA in year 1, and clinics followed usual clinic protocol for scheduling mammograms; or (3) nurse support: A nurse manager provided in-person education and recommendation, scheduled mammograms, and followed up with phone support. In all arms, mammography was offered at no cost to uninsured patients.

resultsOf 624 eligible women, biennial mammography within 24-30 months of their previous test was performed for 11.0% of women in the enhanced-care arm, 7.1% in the education- intervention arm, and 48.0% in the nurse-support arm (p<0.0001). The incremental cost was $1,232 per additional woman undergoing screening with nurse support vs. enhanced care and $1,092 with nurse support vs. education.

conclusionsBiennial mammography screening rates were improved by providing nurse support but not with enhanced care or education. However, this approach was not cost-effective.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMedically Underserved AreaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCommunity Health CentersCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLouisianaMale

Identifiers

PMID25692910
PMCPMC4394885
OpenAlexW1970880821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.