Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25692889›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Development and blind clinical validation of a microRNA based predictor of response to treatment with R-CHO(E)P in DLBCL.

Steen Knudsen, Christoffer Hother, Kirsten Grønbæk, Thomas Jensen, Anker Hansen, Wiktor Mazin, Jesper Dahlgaard, Michael Boe Møller, Elizabeth Ralfkiær, Peter de Nully Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steen KnudsenMedical Prognosis Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Christoffer HotherRigshospitalet, Department of Hematology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kirsten GrønbækRigshospitalet, Department of Hematology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas JensenMedical Prognosis Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Anker HansenMedical Prognosis Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Wiktor MazinMedical Prognosis Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Jesper DahlgaardMedical Prognosis Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Michael Boe MøllerOdense University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Odense, Denmark.
Elizabeth RalfkiærRigshospitalet, Department of Pathology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter de Nully BrownRigshospitalet, Department of Hematology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Medical Prognosis Institute (Denmark) · DKRigshospitalet · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are a group of short noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the posttranscriptional level. It has been shown that microRNAs are independent predictors of outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with the drug combination R-CHOP. Based on the measured growth inhibition of 60 human cancer cell lines (NCI60) in the presence of doxorubicine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and etoposide as well as the baseline microRNA expression of the 60 cell lines, a microRNA based response predictor to CHOP was developed. The response predictor consisting of 20 microRNAs was blindly validated in a cohort of 116 de novo DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP or R-CHOEP as first line treatment. The predicted sensitivity based on diagnostic FFPE samples matched the clinical response, with decreasing sensitivity in poor responders (P = 0.03). When the International Prognostic Index (IPI) was included in the prediction analysis, the separation between responders and non-responders improved (P = 0.001). Thirteen patients developed relapse, and five patients predicted sensitive to their second and third line treatment survived a median 1194 days, while eight patients predicted not sensitive to their second and third line treatment survived a median 187 days (90% CI: 485 days versus 227 days). Among the latter group it was predicted that four would have been sensitive to another second line treatment than the one they received. The predictions were almost the same when diagnostic biopsies were used as when relapse biopsies were used. These preliminary findings warrant testing in a larger cohort of relapse patients to confirm whether the miRNA based predictor can select the optimal second line treatment and increase survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiopsyCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinMicroRNAsPrednisoneR-CHOP protocolRituximabVincristine

Identifiers

PMID25692889
PMCPMC4333339
OpenAlexW2069426449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.