Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25692455›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2015

Parents' decision-making about the human papillomavirus vaccine for their daughters: I. Quantitative results.

Andrea Krawczyk, Bärbel Knäuper, Vladimir Gilca, Eve Dubé, Samara Perez, Keven Joyal-Desmarais, Zeev Rosberger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions to Engage Affective Forecasting in Health-Related Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Krawczyka Department of Psychology ; McGill University ; Montreal , QC , Canada.
Bärbel Knäuper
Vladimir Gilca
Eve Dubé
Samara Perez
Keven Joyal-Desmarais
Zeev Rosberger
McGill University · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAJewish General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV) is an effective primary prevention measure for HPV-related diseases. For children and young adolescents, the uptake of the vaccine is contingent on parental consent. This study sought to identify key differences between parents who obtain (acceptors) and parents who refuse (non-acceptors) the HPV vaccine for their daughters. In the context of a free, universal, school-based HPV vaccination program in Québec, 774 parents of 9-10 year-old girls completed and returned a questionnaire by mail. The questionnaire was based on the theoretical constructs of the Health Belief Model (HBM), along with constructs from other theoretical frameworks. Of the 774 parents, 88.2% reported their daughter having received the HPV vaccine. Perceived susceptibility of daughters to HPV infection, perceived benefits of the vaccine, perceived barriers (including safety of the vaccine), and cues to action significantly distinguished between parents whose daughters had received the HPV vaccine and those whose daughters had not. Other significant factors associated with daughter vaccine uptake were parents' general vaccination attitudes, anticipated regret, adherence to other routinely recommended vaccines, social norms, and positive media influence. The results of this study identify a number of important correlates related to parents' decisions to accept or refuse the HPV vaccine uptake for their daughters. Future work may benefit from targeting such factors and incorporating other health behavior theories in the design of effective HPV vaccine uptake interventions.

Indexed as

Decision MakingNuclear FamilyParentsAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CareQuebecRandom AllocationSurveys and QuestionnairesPapillomavirus VaccinesCAIQ, Commission d’Accès à l’Information du Québeccancer vaccineCI, Confidence Intervaldecision-makingGW, Genital WartsHBM, Health Belief ModelHL, Hosmer-LemeshowHPV, Human PapillomavirusHuman papillomavirusOR, Odds Ratiopapillomavirus vaccinequantitative researchRAMQ, Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québecsocial determinants of healthSTI, Sexually Transmitted InfectionUS, United Statesvaccine attitudes

Identifiers

PMID25692455
PMCPMC4514251
OpenAlexW4239109120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.