Trial reportCOPD2015
One-Year Safety of Olodaterol Once Daily via Respimat® in Patients with GOLD 2-4 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results of a Pre-Specified Pooled Analysis.
Trial report in COPD, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 7 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 mcg [2 Actuations of 2.5 mcg] and 10 mcg [2 Actuations of 5 mcg]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 mcg [2 Actuations of 2.5 mcg] and 10 mcg [2 Actuations of 5 mcg]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD
A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 µg [2 Actuations of 2.5 ug] and 10 ug [2 Actuations of 5 ug]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, and 48 Weeks of Twice Daily Foradil® (12 µg) Delivered by the Aerolizer® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 µg [2 Actuations of 2.5 ug] and 10 ug [2 Actuations of 5 ug]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, and 48 Weeks of Twice Daily Foradil® (12 µg) Delivered by the Aerolizer® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
An 8-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of CHF 718 pMDI (HFA Beclomethasone Dipropionate Via Pressured Metered Dose Inhaler) in Asthmatic Subjects.
A 6-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of CHF 5259 pMDI (HFA Glycopyrronium Bromide Via Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler) in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Incomplete Block Cross-over, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of CHF 1531 pMDI (Formoterol Fumarate) in Asthmatic Subjects
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fixed-Dose Combinations of Long-Acting Bronchodilators for the Management of COPD: Global and Asian Perspectives.Advances in therapy · 2019Pooled it
- Relationship of inhaled long-acting bronchodilators with cardiovascular outcomes among patients with stable COPD: a meta-analysis and systematic review of 43 randomized trials.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Pooled it
- The impact of olodaterol on the risk of mortality and serious adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Pooled it
- Long-term safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in older patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD in the TONADO® studies.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2020Trial
- Comprehensive assessment of the safety of olodaterol 5 µg in the RespimatNPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2017Trial
- Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study to investigate different dosing regimens of olodaterol delivered via Respimat® in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma.Respiratory research · 2015Trial
- Review
- Cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using olodaterol and other long-acting beta2-agonists.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2022Article
- No Influence on Cardiac Arrhythmia or Heart Rate from Long-Term Treatment with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Monocomponents by Holter ECG Analysis in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Article
- Effects of LAMA/LABA Alone and in Combination on Cardiac Safety.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Article
- A Post Hoc Holter ECG Analysis of Olodaterol and Formoterol in Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Article
- What Does the TOVITO Programme Tell Us about How We Can Manage COPD?Turkish thoracic journal · 2018Review
- Striving for optimal bronchodilation: focus on olodaterol.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016Review
- Review
- Combined bronchodilators (tiotropium plus olodaterol) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015Review
- Pharmacologic rationale underlying the therapeutic effects of tiotropium/olodaterol in COPD.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2015Review
- Differential pharmacology and clinical utility of long-acting bronchodilators in COPD - focus on olodaterol.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The novel long-acting β2-agonist olodaterol demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in short-term phase II clinical studies. This analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III studies (1222.11, NCT00782210; 1222.12, NCT00782509; 1222.13, NCT00793624; 1222.14, NCT00796653) evaluated the long-term safety of olodaterol once daily (QD) in a large cohort of patients with moderate to very severe (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2-4) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The studies compared olodaterol (5 or 10 μg) QD via Respimat®, formoterol 12 μg twice daily (BID) via Aerolizer® (1222.13 and 1222.14), and placebo for 48 weeks. Patients continued receiving background maintenance therapy, with ∼60% receiving concomitant cardiovascular therapy and 25% having a history of concomitant cardiac disease. Pre-specified analyses of pooled data assessed the adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs in the whole population, and in subgroups with cardiac disease, along with in-depth electrocardiogram and Holter monitoring. In total, 3104 patients were included in the safety analysis: 876 received olodaterol 5 μg, 883 received olodaterol 10 μg, 885 received placebos, and 460 received formoterol 12 μg BID. Overall incidence of on-treatment AEs (71.2%), serious AEs (16.1%), and deaths (1.7%) were balanced across treatment groups. Respiratory and cardiovascular AEs, including major adverse cardiac events, were reported at similar frequencies in placebo and active treatment groups. The safety profiles of both olodaterol 5 μg (marketed and registered dose) and 10 μg QD delivered via Respimat® are comparable to placebo and formoterol BID in this population, with no safety signals identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.