Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25692024›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2015

Active surveillance of visual impairment due to adverse drug reactions: findings from a national study in the United Kingdom.

Phillippa M Cumberland, Isabelle Russell-Eggitt, Jugnoo S Rahi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Phillippa M CumberlandLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, University College London (UCL) Institute of Child Health London, United Kingdom ; Ulverscroft Vision Research Group London, United Kingdom.
Isabelle Russell-EggittUlverscroft Vision Research Group London, United Kingdom ; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London, United Kingdom.
Jugnoo S RahiLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, University College London (UCL) Institute of Child Health London, United Kingdom ; Ulverscroft Vision Research Group London, United Kingdom ; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London, United Kingdom ; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology London, United Kingdom.
Ulverscroft (United Kingdom) · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAs visual impairment (VI) due to adverse drug reactions (ADR) is rare in adults and children, there is an incomplete evidence base to inform guidance for screening and for counseling patients on the potential risks of medications. We report on suspected drugs and the eye conditions found in a national study of incidence of diagnosis of visual impairment due to suspected ADR. Case ascertainment was via the British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit (BOSU), between March 2010 and February 2012, with follow-up after 6 months. CASE DEFINITION: any child or adult with bilateral or unilateral visual impairment due to a suspected ADR, using distance acuity worse than Snellen 6/18 (logMAR 0.48) in the better eye (bilateral) or affected eye (unilateral). Anonymized patient information on potential cases was provided by managing ophthalmologists, comprising visual status before and after suspected ADR, ophthalmic condition attributable to the ADR, preexisting eye disease and prescribed medications at the time of the ADR. Permanency and causality of the visual impairment were confirmed by the managing clinician, after 6 months, using the WHO Uppsala Monitoring Committee criteria. Over 2 years, 36 eligible cases were reported of whom 23 had permanent VI. While most cases were due to drugs known to have adverse side-effects, some were unanticipated sporadic cases. Visual impairment due to ADRs is rare. However, with for example, increasing polypharmacy in the elderly, monitoring of ocular ADRs, although challenging, is necessary.

Indexed as

Active surveillanceadverse drug reactionsocularpharmacoepidemiologyvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID25692024
PMCPMC4317237
OpenAlexW2048961564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.