Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25691992›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2015

Sexual segregation in North American elk: the role of density dependence.

Kelley M Stewart, Danielle R Walsh, John G Kie, Brian L Dick, R Terry Bowyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Conceptual and methodological advances in habitat-selection modeling: guidelines for ecology and evolution.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelley M StewartDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada Reno Reno, Nevada, 89557.
Danielle R WalshDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada Reno Reno, Nevada, 89557.
John G KieDepartment of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University Stop 8007, 921 South 8th Avenue, Pocatello, Idaho, 83209.
Brian L DickUnited States Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, 1401 Gekeler Lane, La Grande, Oregon, 97850.
R Terry BowyerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University Stop 8007, 921 South 8th Avenue, Pocatello, Idaho, 83209.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated how density-dependent processes and subsequent variation in nutritional condition of individuals influenced both timing and duration of sexual segregation and selection of resources. During 1999-2001, we experimentally created two population densities of North American elk (Cervus elaphus), a high-density population at 20 elk/km(2), and a low-density population at 4 elk/km(2) to test hypotheses relative to timing and duration of sexual segregation and variation in selection of resources. We used multi-response permutation procedures to investigate patterns of sexual segregation, and resource selection functions to document differences in selection of resources by individuals in high- and low-density populations during sexual segregation and aggregation. The duration of sexual segregation was 2 months longer in the high-density population and likely was influenced by individuals in poorer nutritional condition, which corresponded with later conception and parturition, than at low density. Males and females in the high-density population overlapped in selection of resources to a greater extent than in the low-density population, probably resulting from density-dependent effects of increased intraspecific competition and lower availability of resources.

Indexed as

Cervus elaphusdensity dependenceexperimental manipulationintrasexual competitionNorth American elkresource selectionsexual segregation

Identifiers

PMID25691992
PMCPMC4328773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.