Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25691967›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2015

Outbreeding effects in an inbreeding insect, Cimex lectularius.

Toby Fountain, Roger K Butlin, Klaus Reinhardt, Oliver Otti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Toby FountainAnimal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK ; Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki PO Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Roger K ButlinAnimal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK ; Sven Lovén Centre - Tjärnö, University of Gothenburg SE, 452 96, Strömstad, Sweden.
Klaus ReinhardtAnimal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK ; Institute for Evolution and Ecology, University of Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 28, D-72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Oliver OttiAnimal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK ; Animal Population Ecology, Animal Ecology I, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth Universitätsstrasse 30, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany.
University of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Bayreuth · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In some species, populations with few founding individuals can be resilient to extreme inbreeding. Inbreeding seems to be the norm in the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius, a flightless insect that, nevertheless, can reach large deme sizes and persist successfully. However, bed bugs can also be dispersed passively by humans, exposing inbred populations to gene flow from genetically distant populations. The introduction of genetic variation through this outbreeding could lead to increased fitness (heterosis) or be costly by causing a loss of local adaptation or exposing genetic incompatibility between populations (outbreeding depression). Here, we addressed how inbreeding within demes and outbreeding between distant populations impact fitness over two generations in this re-emerging public health pest. We compared fitness traits of families that were inbred (mimicking reproduction following a founder event) or outbred (mimicking reproduction following a gene flow event). We found that outbreeding led to increased starvation resistance compared to inbred families, but this benefit was lost after two generations of outbreeding. No other fitness benefits of outbreeding were observed in either generation, including no differences in fecundity between the two treatments. Resilience to inbreeding is likely to result from the history of small founder events in the bed bug. Outbreeding benefits may only be detectable under stress and when heterozygosity is maximized without disruption of coadaptation. We discuss the consequences of these results both in terms of inbreeding and outbreeding in populations with genetic and spatial structuring, as well as for the recent resurgence of bed bug populations.

Indexed as

Cimex lectulariuscolonizationinbreedingmetapopulation dynamicsoutbreeding depression

Identifiers

PMID25691967
PMCPMC4314272
OpenAlexW2019146676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.