Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25691961›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2015

Gene flow and population structure of a solitary top carnivore in a human-dominated landscape.

Jeannine S McManus, Desiré L Dalton, Antoinette Kotzé, Bool Smuts, Amy Dickman, Jason P Marshal, Mark Keith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeannine S McManusSchool of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Private Bag X3, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa ; Landmark Foundation P.O. Box 22, Riversdale, 6670, South Africa.
Desiré L DaltonNational Zoological Gardens of South Africa P.O. Box 754, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa ; Genetics Department, University of the Free State P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa.
Antoinette KotzéNational Zoological Gardens of South Africa P.O. Box 754, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa ; Genetics Department, University of the Free State P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa.
Bool SmutsLandmark Foundation P.O. Box 22, Riversdale, 6670, South Africa.
Amy DickmanWildCRU, Oxford University Abingdon Road, Tubney, Abingdon, OX13 5QL, UK.
Jason P MarshalSchool of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Private Bag X3, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa.
Mark KeithSchool of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Private Bag X3, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa ; Centre for Wildlife Management, University of Pretoria Private Bag X20 Hatfield, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of the Free State · ZAARK Foundation · BDUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While African leopard populations are considered to be continuous as demonstrated by their high genetic variation, the southernmost leopard population exists in the Eastern and Western Cape, South Africa, where anthropogenic activities may be affecting this population's structure. Little is known about the elusive, last free-roaming top predator in the region and this study is the first to report on leopard population structuring using nuclear DNA. By analyzing 14 microsatellite markers from 40 leopard tissue samples, we aimed to understand the populations' structure, genetic distance, and gene flow (Nm). Our results, based on spatially explicit analysis with Bayesian methods, indicate that leopards in the region exist in a fragmented population structure with lower than expected genetic diversity. Three population groups were identified, between which low to moderate levels of gene flow were observed (Nm 0.5 to 3.6). One subpopulation exhibited low genetic differentiation, suggesting a continuous population structure, while the remaining two appear to be less connected, with low emigration and immigration between these populations. Therefore, genetic barriers are present between the subpopulations, and while leopards in the study region may function as a metapopulation, anthropogenic activities threaten to decrease habitat and movement further. Our results indicate that the leopard population may become isolated within a few generations and suggest that management actions should aim to increase habitat connectivity and reduce human-carnivore conflict. Understanding genetic diversity and connectivity of populations has important conservation implications that can highlight management of priority populations to reverse the effects of human-caused extinctions.

Indexed as

Gene flowgenetic differentiationhabitat fragmentationPanthera parduspopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID25691961
PMCPMC4314266
OpenAlexW1964530184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.