ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2015
Clustering of reads with alignment-free measures and quality values.
Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- De Novo Clustering of Long-Read Transcriptome Data Using a Greedy, Quality Value-Based Algorithm.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2020Article
- Better quality score compression through sequence-based quality smoothing.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- MetaCon: unsupervised clustering of metagenomic contigs with probabilistic k-mers statistics and coverage.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Efficient computation of spaced seed hashing with block indexing.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- MeShClust: an intelligent tool for clustering DNA sequences.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- FSH: fast spaced seed hashing exploiting adjacent hashes.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2018Article
- Alignment-free sequence comparison: benefits, applications, and tools.Genome biology · 2017Review
- Fast comparison of genomic and meta-genomic reads with alignment-free measures based on quality values.BMC medical genomics · 2016Article
- Scalable metagenomics alignment research tool (SMART): a scalable, rapid, and complete search heuristic for the classification of metagenomic sequences from complex sequence populations.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- On the comparison of regulatory sequences with multiple resolution Entropic Profiles.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Recovering full-length viral genomes from metagenomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe data volume generated by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies is growing at a pace that is now challenging the storage and data processing capacities of modern computer systems. In this context an important aspect is the reduction of data complexity by collapsing redundant reads in a single cluster to improve the run time, memory requirements, and quality of post-processing steps like assembly and error correction. Several alignment-free measures, based on k-mers counts, have been used to cluster reads. Quality scores produced by NGS platforms are fundamental for various analysis of NGS data like reads mapping and error detection. Moreover future-generation sequencing platforms will produce long reads but with a large number of erroneous bases (up to 15 %).
resultsIn this scenario it will be fundamental to exploit quality value information within the alignment-free framework. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study that incorporates quality value information and k-mers counts, in the context of alignment-free measures, for the comparison of reads data. Based on this principles, in this paper we present a family of alignment-free measures called D (q) -type. A set of experiments on simulated and real reads data confirms that the new measures are superior to other classical alignment-free statistics, especially when erroneous reads are considered. Also results on de novo assembly and metagenomic reads classification show that the introduction of quality values improves over standard alignment-free measures. These statistics are implemented in a software called QCluster (http://www.dei.unipd.it/~ciompin/main/qcluster.html).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.