ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2015
KECSA-Movable Type Implicit Solvation Model (KMTISM).
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Free Energy Calculations Using the Movable Type Method with Molecular Dynamics Driven Protein-Ligand Sampling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022Article
- Virtual Combinatorial Chemistry and Pharmacological Screening: A Short Guide to Drug Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- MovableType Software for Fast Free Energy-Based Virtual Screening: Protocol Development, Deployment, Validation, and Assessment.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020Article
- MathDL: mathematical deep learning for D3R Grand Challenge 4.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2020Article
- Application of the Movable Type Free Energy Method to the Caspase-Inhibitor BindingAffinity Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Mathematical deep learning for pose and binding affinity prediction and ranking in D3R Grand Challenges.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2019Article
- Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2018Article
- Free-Energy-Based Protein Design: Re-Engineering Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Protein II Assisted by the Moveable-Type Approach.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018Article
- Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2017Review
- On the fly estimation of host-guest binding free energies using the movable type method: participation in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computation of the solvation free energy for chemical and biological processes has long been of significant interest. The key challenges to effective solvation modeling center on the choice of potential function and configurational sampling. Herein, an energy sampling approach termed the “Movable Type” (MT) method, and a statistical energy function for solvation modeling, “Knowledge-based and Empirical Combined Scoring Algorithm” (KECSA) are developed and utilized to create an implicit solvation model: KECSA-Movable Type Implicit Solvation Model (KMTISM) suitable for the study of chemical and biological systems. KMTISM is an implicit solvation model, but the MT method performs energy sampling at the atom pairwise level. For a specific molecular system, the MT method collects energies from prebuilt databases for the requisite atom pairs at all relevant distance ranges, which by its very construction encodes all possible molecular configurations simultaneously. Unlike traditional statistical energy functions, KECSA converts structural statistical information into categorized atom pairwise interaction energies as a function of the radial distance instead of a mean force energy function. Within the implicit solvent model approximation, aqueous solvation free energies are then obtained from the NVT ensemble partition function generated by the MT method. Validation is performed against several subsets selected from the Minnesota Solvation Database v2012. Results are compared with several solvation free energy calculation methods, including a one-to-one comparison against two commonly used classical implicit solvation models: MM-GBSA and MM-PBSA. Comparison against a quantum mechanics based polarizable continuum model is also discussed (Cramer and Truhlar’s Solvation Model 12).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.