Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25691827›Full record

ReviewContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2015

Computational characterisation of cancer molecular profiles derived using next generation sequencing.

Urszula Oleksiewicz, Katarzyna Tomczak, Jakub Woropaj, Monika Markowska, Piotr Stępniak, Parantu K Shah

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. lncRNA in HNSCC: challenges and potential.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Urszula OleksiewiczLaboratory of Gene Therapy, Department of Cancer Immunology, The Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland ; Department of Cancer Immunology and Diagnostics, Chair of Medical Biotechnology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland ; These authors contributed equally to this paper.
Katarzyna TomczakLaboratory of Gene Therapy, Department of Cancer Immunology, The Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland ; Department of Cancer Immunology and Diagnostics, Chair of Medical Biotechnology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland ; Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw ; These authors contributed equally to this paper.
Jakub WoropajPoznan University of Economics, Poznań, Poland ; These authors contributed equally to this paper.
Monika MarkowskaTransition Technologies S.A., Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr StępniakTransition Technologies S.A., Warsaw, Poland.
Parantu K ShahInstitute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Transition Technologies (Poland) · PLGreater Poland Cancer Center · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLPoznań University of Economics and Business · PLThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our current understanding of cancer genetics is grounded on the principle that cancer arises from a clone that has accumulated the requisite somatically acquired genetic aberrations, leading to the malignant transformation. It also results in aberrent of gene and protein expression. Next generation sequencing (NGS) or deep sequencing platforms are being used to create large catalogues of changes in copy numbers, mutations, structural variations, gene fusions, gene expression, and other types of information for cancer patients. However, inferring different types of biological changes from raw reads generated using the sequencing experiments is algorithmically and computationally challenging. In this article, we outline common steps for the quality control and processing of NGS data. We highlight the importance of accurate and application-specific alignment of these reads and the methodological steps and challenges in obtaining different types of information. We comment on the importance of integrating these data and building infrastructure to analyse it. We also provide exhaustive lists of available software to obtain information and point the readers to articles comparing software for deeper insight in specialised areas. We hope that the article will guide readers in choosing the right tools for analysing oncogenomic datasets.

Indexed as

next generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID25691827
PMCPMC4322529
OpenAlexW2331910758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.