Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25691773›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

Novel actions of next-generation taxanes benefit advanced stages of prostate cancer.

Renée de Leeuw, Lisa D Berman-Booty, Matthew J Schiewer, Stephen J Ciment, Robert B Den, Adam P Dicker, William K Kelly, Edouard J Trabulsi, Costas D Lallas, Leonard G Gomella and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renée de LeeuwDepartment of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lisa D Berman-BootyDepartment of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Matthew J SchiewerDepartment of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stephen J CimentDepartment of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert B DenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Adam P DickerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
William K KellyKimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Edouard J TrabulsiKimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Costas D LallasKimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Leonard G GomellaKimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Karen E KnudsenDepartment of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. karen.knudsen@jefferson.edu.
Thomas Jefferson University · USSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-Ray Crystallography and Macromolecular CharacterizationP30CA056036 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL P SILVER · 1995 to 2026
$94.8M
Cyclin D1: repercussions of AR control and alternative splicing in prostate canceR01CA099996 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2003 to 2013
$2.6M
RB Function in Prostate Cancer ProgressionR01CA176401 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
SWI/SNF dysregulation in development and diseaseR01CA159945 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Inhibition of Prostate Carcinogenesis & Tumor Growth by Energy Restriction-MimetiK01OD010463 · OD · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI BERMAN-BOOTY, LISA DANIELLE · 2012 to 2014
$390k
NCI NIH HHS CA159945-03NCI NIH HHS CA176401-01A1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA056036NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099996NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099996-11NCI NIH HHS R01 CA159945NCI NIH HHS R01 CA176401NIH HHS K01 OD010463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo improve the outcomes of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), there is an urgent need for more effective therapies and approaches that individualize specific treatments for patients with CRPC. These studies compared the novel taxane cabazitaxel with the previous generation docetaxel, and aimed to determine which tumors are most likely to respond. EXPERIMENTAL

designCabazitaxel and docetaxel were compared via in vitro modeling to determine the molecular mechanism, biochemical and cell biologic impact, and cell proliferation, which was further assessed ex vivo in human tumor explants. Isogenic pairs of RB knockdown and control cells were interrogated in vitro and in xenograft tumors for cabazitaxel response.

resultsThe data herein show that (i) cabazitaxel exerts stronger cytostatic and cytotoxic response compared with docetaxel, especially in CRPC; (ii) cabazitaxel induces aberrant mitosis, leading to pyknotic and multinucleated cells; (iii) taxanes do not act through the androgen receptor (AR); (iv) gene-expression profiling reveals distinct molecular actions for cabazitaxel; and (v) tumors that have progressed to castration resistance via loss of RB show enhanced sensitivity to cabazitaxel.

conclusionsCabazitaxel not only induces improved cytostatic and cytotoxic effects, but also affects distinct molecular pathways, compared with docetaxel, which could underlie its efficacy after docetaxel treatment has failed in patients with CRPC. Finally, RB is identified as the first potential biomarker that could define the therapeutic response to taxanes in metastatic CRPC. This would suggest that loss of RB function induces sensitization to taxanes, which could benefit up to 50% of CRPC cases.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDocetaxelFlow CytometryHumansImmunoblottingMaleMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, MolecularOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantTaxoidsTranscriptomeAntineoplastic AgentscabazitaxelDocetaxelTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID25691773
PMCPMC4333741
OpenAlexW1967774964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.